2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the tribological characteristics of tool and mould surfaces by machine hammer peening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account the result of the hardness measurements of the treated surface, the improvement is as high as 47 percent. The achieved surface hardness as well as the surface roughness is strongly affected by the stroke h and the impact angle βi of the tool tip [12]. Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the result of the hardness measurements of the treated surface, the improvement is as high as 47 percent. The achieved surface hardness as well as the surface roughness is strongly affected by the stroke h and the impact angle βi of the tool tip [12]. Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is used in this research work. Bleicher et al [9] investigated the basic mechanism of surface modifications with regard to strain hardening and residual stresses as well as analyzed tribological characteristics of tool and mold surfaces after MHP [10]. Ripoll et al [11] continued this research and investigated the possibility to improve the wear resistance of functional surfaces by embedding hard particles into the surface.…”
Section: Initial Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one study [16] describes piezoelectric machine hammer tools with impact frequencies up to 700 Hz. The workpiece is routed with the tool in multiple lines, generating a geometrically defined area with multiple impacts [17]. It also enables an increase in hardness and the introduction of residual compressive stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common finishing processes and their influence on surface and subsurface properties (cf. e.g., [1,4,17].). Nevertheless, none of the processes presented here is suitable to generate a designated specific functional surface structure and induce compressive residual stresses in the subsurface layer while maintaining a constant tool-workpiece contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%