2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.596641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the visualization of 3D ultrasound data with 3D filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in shear-object coordinates: z max z min volume rendering and 3D boxcar filtering on it [8][9][10]. We have now integrated the cut operator C{·} and our proposed method into this machine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in shear-object coordinates: z max z min volume rendering and 3D boxcar filtering on it [8][9][10]. We have now integrated the cut operator C{·} and our proposed method into this machine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows a typical mono-volume rendering pipeline. To reduce noise in 3D ultrasound data, 3D filtering (e.g., 3D boxcar filtering [26]) is utilized. Then, classification is applied for better visualization by assigning colors and/or opacity values to the voxels.…”
Section: Mono-volume Rendering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Recently, a method using two filtered datasets for the resampling and the gradient estimation has been proposed to acquire noise-insensitive images. 15 A dataset filtered with small kernel is used for space leaping, and a dataset filtered with large kernel is used to estimate gradient vectors. However, adaptive filters rely on statistical identification and require a model to quantify the amount of noise present.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] If we use filtering, neighboring voxels are referred to. If the noise exists locally in transparent regions, it is not considered because it spreads over the neighboring voxels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%