2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving water productivity in moisture-limited rice-based cropping systems through incorporation of maize and mungbean: A modelling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The APSIM phenology model is simple compared to more complex rate-based models [30,35]. However, the prediction of flowering and maturity times using the phenology model embedded in the APSIM model was found to be reasonably accurate [10,37]. In Chauhan and Rachaputi [37], the mungbean cultivar 'Crystal' required a total of 1200 • C d from sowing to maturity and this was similar to the older cultivar 'Emerald' already parametrised in APSIM.…”
Section: Crop Phenologymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The APSIM phenology model is simple compared to more complex rate-based models [30,35]. However, the prediction of flowering and maturity times using the phenology model embedded in the APSIM model was found to be reasonably accurate [10,37]. In Chauhan and Rachaputi [37], the mungbean cultivar 'Crystal' required a total of 1200 • C d from sowing to maturity and this was similar to the older cultivar 'Emerald' already parametrised in APSIM.…”
Section: Crop Phenologymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Notwithstanding a several-fold increase in mungbean production, the average yield of mungbean on Australian farms is still less than one t/ha, despite the yield potential for mungbean being around three t/ha [9]. Similar yields have also been harvested in Sri Lanka [10]. Even in trials conducted under relatively well-managed conditions, yield is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Nelson et al (1998a,b) used APSIM to simulate a maize and Desmanthus virgatus intercrop system, the two crops were grown as monocultures and did use the CANOPY module. It was not clear whether Amarasingha et al (2017) used the CANOPY module when maize and mung bean intercrop systems were simulated in APSIM. In contrast, Knörzer et al (2011) found that APSIM was unable to simulate wheat-pea and maize-pea intercropping systems in Germany because it strongly underestimates the competitive ability of the species that was planted the first relative to the one that was planted last.…”
Section: Apsim Maize -Bambara Groundnut Intercrop Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The APSIM phenology model is simple compared to more complex rate-based models (Summerfield and Lawn, 1987;Imrie and Lawn, 1990). However, the prediction of flowering and maturity times using the phenology model embedded in the APSIM model was found to be reasonably accurate (Chauhan and Rachaputi, 2014;Amarasingha et al, 2017). In Chauhan and Rachaputi (2014), the mungbean cultivar 'Crystal' required a total of 1200 °C d from sowing to maturity and this was similar to the older cultivar 'Emerald' already parametrised in APSIM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Notwithstanding a several-fold increase in mungbean production, the average yield of mungbean on Australian farms is still less than one t/ha, despite the yield potential for mungbean being around three t/ha (Thomas et al, 2004). Similar yields have also been harvested in Sri Lanka (Amarasingha et al, 2017). Even in trials conducted under relatively well-managed conditions, yield is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%