“…They include: intervention feasibility, behavioural and psychological symptoms (BPSD), quality of life (QoL), and participants’ interactions with their environment. First, more than half of the papers in this review recorded findings on the feasibility of their intervention ( n = 36) (Abrahão et al, 2018; Bennett et al, 2016; Capstick, 2011; Capstick & Ludwin, 2015; Cheng & Lee, 2018; Cruz-Sandoval et al, 2018; Czech et al, 2020; De Kok et al, 2018; Favilla & Pedell, 2013, 2014; Golden et al, 2017; Gu et al, 2013; Hodge et al, 2018; Houben, Brankaert, et al, 2020; Houben, Lehn, et al, 2020; Hsu et al, 2019; Iacono & Marti, 2016; Jamin et al, 2018; Kenning et al, 2019; Lancioni et al, 2017; Lazar et al, 2017a, 2017b; Leuty et al, 2013; Luyten et al, 2018; Manca et al, 2021; Morrissey et al, 2016; Murphy et al, 2018; Nayer et al, 2014; Orpwood et al, 2010; Peeters et al, 2016; Rosseland & Culén, 2016; Seymour et al, 2017; Thoolen et al, 2019; Treadaway et al, 2019; Treadaway & Kenning, 2015, 2016; Tyack et al, 2017). This was largely reported as whether the activity/device had been successful/unsuccessful, although certain papers reported the iterative steps taken (in terms of pointers for design) to achieve success.…”