2001
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-beam PET measurements of β+radioactivity induced by proton beams

Abstract: Our first in-beam PET measurements of the beta+ activation induced by proton irradiation are presented. Monoenergetic proton beams in the energy and intensity range suited for the treatment of deep-seated tumours were delivered by the synchrotron of the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung Darmstadt (GSI). They were stopped in PMMA blocks placed in the centre of the field of view of the positron camera that is installed in the heavy ion tumour treatment facility at GSI. The beta+ activity signal was found to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
239
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
239
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the depth under 30 cm the production of the isotopes is almost without structure, reflecting the fact that the cross sections remain almost unchanged in the energy range above 100MeV. In this range, the yields calculated with four different cross section data resources reach fairly good agreement with each other, except the 11 C isotope production obtained with the data from reference [11] where the 11 C production is only about 30% of productions obtained with the other data resources, mainly because only one of the three major channels producing 11 C isotope is taken into account [6]. In the depth range between 30 cm and 38 cm where the Bragg peak is located, the calculated productions are significantly different for all three isotopes (see Figures 9-11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the depth under 30 cm the production of the isotopes is almost without structure, reflecting the fact that the cross sections remain almost unchanged in the energy range above 100MeV. In this range, the yields calculated with four different cross section data resources reach fairly good agreement with each other, except the 11 C isotope production obtained with the data from reference [11] where the 11 C production is only about 30% of productions obtained with the other data resources, mainly because only one of the three major channels producing 11 C isotope is taken into account [6]. In the depth range between 30 cm and 38 cm where the Bragg peak is located, the calculated productions are significantly different for all three isotopes (see Figures 9-11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In this range, the yields calculated with four different cross section data resources reach fairly good agreement with each other, except the 11 C isotope production obtained with the data from reference [11]. The C 11 isotope production calculated with the data from reference [11] used by Parodi et al is only about 30% of production compared with the other data resources, mainly because only one of the three major channels producing 11 C isotope is taken into account [12]. In the depth range between 30cm and 38cm where the Bragg peak is located, the calculated productions with data resources are significantly different for all three isotopes (see This investigation shows that there is an on going need to develop a library of accurate cross section data for proton and neutron-induced reactions on the elements in human tissue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The HU-dependent adjustment of electromagnetic and nuclear processes within each material was accomplished using scaling factors to reproduce the calibration curve used by the treatment-planning (TP) dose algorithm, and to account for differences between real and nominal density (6,10). Positron emitter distributions were calculated by internally combining proton fluence with experimental cross sections (12). Besides the main (p, pn) channels on 12 C and 16 O yielding 11 C and 15 O (12), respectively, further proton interactions with N, O, Ca, and P, resulting in 11 C, 13 N, 38 K, and 30 P production, respectively, were included.…”
Section: Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%