In competition with ISI: the perceptions of chief editors of Malaysian local journals

Abstract

Universities have had to develop new strategies to raise their profile in the international marketplace. In Malaysia, as in many other nations, publication in ISI‐ranked journals is a crucial factor. This focus is causing a strain on national journals that suffer from a lack of content, institutional support, and national recognition. This paper presents data about Malaysian journal publishing and the study questioned editors in chief of Malaysian journals to obtain opinions of the problems they encounter and possible solutions. Data were collected through interviews. The participants in the study highlighted four main issues that resulted in a weak publishing environment: institutional reputation building (academic reputation), researcher prestige/image building, lack of focus on local journal issues by legislators, and a weak publishing culture. The article concludes that the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education should pay attention to national initiatives in countries such as India and Australia that recognize national journals and reward researchers for publishing in them.

Scholarly communication and matters of trust and authority: A comparative analysis of Malaysian and Chinese researchers

“…Also, increasingly Malaysian universities have mandated their academic researchers to publish only in journals indexed by the Web of Science (Abrizah et al 2013). Malaysian scholars are also prioritizing submissions of papers to journals indexed in global citation databases, reflecting that they regard these journals as trustworthy and authoritative, leading local journals to receive fewer good quality paper (Bodaghi, Sanni and Zainab 2015). An attempt was made to understand what resources Malaysian scholars choose for their reading, citing and publishing purpose and what their reasons are (Abrizah et al 2015).…”

Usage Trends of Open Access and Local Journals: A Korean Case Study

“…Editors of local journals strive to have their journals indexed in major databases but they are rarely successful [ 2 ]. Therefore, we think that it is important to develop regional databases covering local and regional information from local and regional journals [ 41 – 43 ].…”

“…The second major change is that database technologies have been extensively applied to search engines and to link articles [ 4 ]. Scholarly databases such as Web of Science (WoS)[ 5 ] or Scopus[ 6 ] highlight premium research articles, and locally produced research articles from less developed countries receive fewer citations [ 2 , 7 , 8 ]. Additionally, open access (OA) articles have been integrated into digital publishing models.…”

Question all assumptions: Learned Publishing at 30

“…For tenure, promotion, and job security researchers are still required to publish, and to publish in ‘quality’ journals. The definition of quality is frequently restricted to ‘high impact factor’ (IF) and no matter how many debates there are about the limitations of the IF, and the alternative metrics on offer, it is to the IF that researchers around the world turn (Bodaghi, Sanni, & Zainab, ; O'Neill, ). This presents challenges for researchers and publishers alike – how can new models be developed and supported when researchers (especially early career researchers, and those in emerging economies) still need to publish in the established, traditional, journals?…”