2018
DOI: 10.1190/int-2018-0076.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-context interpretation: Avoiding pitfalls in misidentification of igneous bodies in seismic data

Abstract: In the past few decades, many exploration wells have been drilled into igneous rocks because of their similar seismic expressions to common exploration targets, such as carbonate mounds, sheet sands, and sand-prone sinuous channels. In cases in which interpreters cannot clearly delineate sedimentary features such as channels or fans, the interpretation may be driven primarily by bright spot anomalies, in which a poor understanding of the wavelet polarity may lead to an erroneous interpretation. Although many w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If these alternating layers of sediment and basalt are <100 m, individual reflectors will not be resolvable (Eide et al., 2018; Mark et al., 2018) and the reflector identified will be both basalt and sediments. Similarly, the combination of sharp velocity changes from alternating layers of basalt and sediment will contribute to imaging and identification difficulties (Infante‐Paez & Marfurt, 2018). We therefore speculate that the mapped basalt may be <100‐m thick when considering difficulties in confidently interpreting the top and base of the horizon in any available seismic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these alternating layers of sediment and basalt are <100 m, individual reflectors will not be resolvable (Eide et al., 2018; Mark et al., 2018) and the reflector identified will be both basalt and sediments. Similarly, the combination of sharp velocity changes from alternating layers of basalt and sediment will contribute to imaging and identification difficulties (Infante‐Paez & Marfurt, 2018). We therefore speculate that the mapped basalt may be <100‐m thick when considering difficulties in confidently interpreting the top and base of the horizon in any available seismic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, igneous rocks have been reconsidered in prospects where they were previously ignored (Holford et al, 2017;Zahedi & MacDonald, 2018;Bischoff, 2019). In New Zealand, pores and fractures have been identified in studies of physical volcanology in cores (Kennedy et al, 2017), reanalysis of ancient magmatic systems with reflection seismic (Bishoff, 2019), application of neural networks in 3D seismic data (Kumar et al, 2019) and study of seismic expressions of igneous rocks (Infante-Paez & Marfurt, 2018).…”
Section: Current Global Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand these rocks, it is necessary to characterize their seismofacies (Delpino & Bermúdez, 2009;Angkasa et al, 2017;Infante-Paez & Marfurt, 2018, Planke et al, 2018, identify the igneous zones in well logs (Planke et al, 1994;Penna et al, 2018;Oliveira et al, 2019;Fornero et al, 2019;Correia et al, 2019), its petrogenesis, and petrophysical properties (Greenfield et al, 2019;. According to Jiang et al (2010), the petrophysical variability of igneous rocks is a key point to define a good reservoir and it can be influenced by cooling fractures, presence of vesicles and breccias, alteration, and fractures after solidification (Sruoga & Rubinstein, 2007;Zou, 2017;Yao et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smallwood and Maresh, 2002;Magee et al, 2016) and saucer geometries showing a flat inner sill that passes laterally into an inclined limb (cf. Polteau et al, 2008;Haug et al, 2018;Infante-Paez and Marfurt, 2018;Schmiedel et al, 2019). C: Intrusive steps, i.e.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smallwood and Maresh, 2002;Magee et al, 2016), (3) saucer-shape geometries forming parts of these lobes (see B) (cf. Polteau et al, 2008;Haug et al, 2018;Infante-Paez and Marfurt, 2018;Schmiedel et al, 2019); (4) intrusive steps (cf. Hansen et al, 2004;Magee et al, 2016;McBride et al, 2018) and (5) elongated amplitude anomalies (cf.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%