2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.848343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-depth overlay contribution analysis of a poly-layer reticle

Abstract: Wafer overlay is one of the key challenges for lithography in semiconductor device manufacturing, this becomes increasingly challenging following the shrinking of the device node. Some of Low k1 techniques, such as Double Exposure add additional burden to the overlay margin because on most critical layers the pattern is created based on exposures of 2 critical masks. Besides impact on overlay performance, any displacement between those two exposures leads to a significant impact on space CD uniformity performa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This very tight specification requires significantly better control of the e-beam mask writer. In the past, the principle registration metric, measurement repeatability, simply followed the ITRS from technology node to technology node, but previously presented papers [2] show some hints that mask lithography systems may have inherent placement errors which are not captured by standard OQC (outgoing quality check). Other evaluations have demonstrated, at least on test masks, that registration errors transfer to the wafer [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This very tight specification requires significantly better control of the e-beam mask writer. In the past, the principle registration metric, measurement repeatability, simply followed the ITRS from technology node to technology node, but previously presented papers [2] show some hints that mask lithography systems may have inherent placement errors which are not captured by standard OQC (outgoing quality check). Other evaluations have demonstrated, at least on test masks, that registration errors transfer to the wafer [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%