2019 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ieeeconf44664.2019.9048975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Field Calibration of Antennas or Antenna Arrays Using Wavefield Modeling

Abstract: Direction-of-arrival (DoA) estimation of radio signals requires accurate knowledge of the employed antenna array characteristics, which is usually obtained by calibration in a measurement chamber. Contrarily we propose an in-field calibration method, which does not require knowledge of the propagation channel or synchronization between transmitter and receiver. In contrast to the literature, the proposed method can be applied to multiport antenna systems of arbitrary type and interpolation of the antenna respo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is that in the unknown channel case, the absolute amplitude and phase of the antenna response are not observable. DoA estimation relies on relative amplitudes and phases, therefore absolute offsets do no harm [52]. Still, the VOLUME 10, 2022 non-observability of absolute amplitude and phase implies that by in-situ antenna calibration, instead of the true antenna response, only an antenna response which is equivalent for DoA estimation can be estimated.…”
Section: A: With Priormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason is that in the unknown channel case, the absolute amplitude and phase of the antenna response are not observable. DoA estimation relies on relative amplitudes and phases, therefore absolute offsets do no harm [52]. Still, the VOLUME 10, 2022 non-observability of absolute amplitude and phase implies that by in-situ antenna calibration, instead of the true antenna response, only an antenna response which is equivalent for DoA estimation can be estimated.…”
Section: A: With Priormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in the last section, these two eigenvalues correspond to the non-observable absolute amplitude and phase. In the case without prior, the two eigenvalues would be zero, hence the pseudoinverse must be applied in ( 50) and (52). Having discussed the sampling matrix EBIM, we now want to assess the BCRB behavior qualitatively to gain some insight into the problem at hand.…”
Section: A: With Priormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the methods are limited to phased arrays. A first approach generalizing infield calibration is presented in [12]. However, an exact DoA reference is required and the work is based on simulation only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%