In Gallipoli's Shadow: Pilgrimage, memory, mourning and the great war

Scates, Bruce

doi:10.1080/10314610208596198

Cited by 54 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Commemorism is evolving. A review of the literature suggests motives for remembrance travel are shifting, from valorising war to an emphasis on its consequences and futility (Allem, 2014;Ekins, 2010;Ekins & Barron, 2014;Fathi, 2019;Scates, 2002). One notes a shift from fatalism and pragmatism to a more philosophical contemplation of meanings and emotions redolent of remembrance (Downes et al, 2015).…”

Section: Commemorationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Machine infelicity in a poignant visitor setting: comparing human and AI’s ability to analyze discourse

MacCarthy

Shan

2021

Current Issues in Tourism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study compares the efficacy of computer and human analytics in a commemorative setting. Both deductive and inductive reasoning are compared using the same data across both methods. The data comprises 2490 non-repeated, non-dialogical social media comments from the popular touristic site Tripadvisor. Included in the analysis is participant observation at two Anzac commemorative sites, one in Western Australia and one in Northern France. The data is then processed using both Leximancer V4.51 and Dialectic Thematic Analysis. The findings demonstrate artificial intelligence (AI) was incapable of insight beyond metric-driven content analysis. While fully deduced by human analysis the metamodel was only partially deduced by AI. There was also a difference in the ability to induce themes with AI producing anodyne, axiomatic concepts. Contrastingly, human analytics was capable of transcendent themes representing ampliative, phronetic knowledge. The implications of the study suggest (1) tempering the belief that the current iteration of AI can do more than organise, summarise, and visualise data; (2) advocating for the inclusion of preconception and context in thematic analysis, and (3) encouraging a discussion of the appropriateness of using AI in research.

show abstract

Section: Commemorationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Machine infelicity in a poignant visitor setting: comparing human and AI’s ability to analyze discourse

MacCarthy

Shan

2021

Current Issues in Tourism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12 More recently, there has emerged a rich and growing area of research around the role of war, commemoration, ritual and pilgrimages in constructing private and collective memories and identity. 13 The divide in Australian war studies is not so much along the fault lines that Lockhart suggests. Rather the divide arises from the fact that the historians researching the social history of war, gender studies and memory-who are often female-rarely interface with those working in the more traditional operational and strategic studies-generally male.…”

Section: Joan Beaumontmentioning

confidence: 96%

The State of Australian History of War

Beaumont

2003

Australian Historical Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For those who could not afford that trip, ‘Will Longstaff’s painting Menin Gate at Midnight […] enabled Australians to contemplate in expressive reproduction a monument, honouring thousands of their missing men, which few could ever hope to see for themselves’ (Inglis and Brazier, 2008: 260). These pilgrimages continue today (Scates, 2002).…”

Section: Conclusion: Beyond the Nation?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Transnational war memories in Australia’s heritage field

Waterton

Dittmer

2016

Media International Australia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic interest in Australia’s heritage field has developed primarily around the ways its subject has been used to support dominant national interests. Understandings of heritage, however, are increasingly shaped by developments occurring in other nation-states, as well as those occurring at the international level. This article considers the changing nature of Australian notions of heritage within the context of the ‘transnational turn’. It does so in two ways. First, the article traces talk of transnationalism at a general level, considering especially theorisations around a materialist understanding of memory. Second, it considers what new representations of the past such a theorisation might call forth in the Australian context. As a point of illustration, the article focuses on the specific case of Australian war memories and their articulation within the heritage field.

show abstract

In Gallipoli's Shadow: Pilgrimage, memory, mourning and the great war

Cited by 54 publications

References 5 publications

Machine infelicity in a poignant visitor setting: comparing human and AI’s ability to analyze discourse

Machine infelicity in a poignant visitor setting: comparing human and AI’s ability to analyze discourse

The State of Australian History of War

Transnational war memories in Australia’s heritage field

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About