2009
DOI: 10.1021/pr8010765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Gel 18O Labeling for Improved Identification of Proteins from 2-DE Gel Spots in Comparative Proteomic Experiments

Abstract: The reliability of 2-DE gel-based comparative proteomics is severely impaired by the potential presence of overlapping proteins. We describe a methodological procedure which may solve this problem. Corresponding protein spots from two experimental groups are digested in the presence of 16O and 18O, respectively. Samples are pooled and proteins identified by MS. The 18O/16O-ratios of the different proteins found in the same spot distinguish proteins with altered from those whose intensity is unchanged.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with earlier reported data on the efficient and complete incorporation of 18 O onto the C-terminus of tryptic peptides with high purity H 2 18 O (>97%) and complete drying of gel pieces prior to digestion and high concentrations of trypsin are used to drive the reaction. 9,42 Tryptic peptides from both the CRC and the normal samples are mixed together (CRC samples labeled with 18 O) immediately prior to injection. Three of the CCAP that had been identified by the targeted MRM approach (Hemoglobin Beta, Protocadherin 24 and Myeloperoxidase) were chosen for this study and compared for CRC patient 4 and normal volunteer 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with earlier reported data on the efficient and complete incorporation of 18 O onto the C-terminus of tryptic peptides with high purity H 2 18 O (>97%) and complete drying of gel pieces prior to digestion and high concentrations of trypsin are used to drive the reaction. 9,42 Tryptic peptides from both the CRC and the normal samples are mixed together (CRC samples labeled with 18 O) immediately prior to injection. Three of the CCAP that had been identified by the targeted MRM approach (Hemoglobin Beta, Protocadherin 24 and Myeloperoxidase) were chosen for this study and compared for CRC patient 4 and normal volunteer 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common denaturing agents that have been used in proteolytic 18 O labeling workflow include urea [16][17][18] and the acid-cleavable surfactant RapiGest TM [19]. When gel electrophoresis (1D-PAGE or 2D-PAGE) is included in the workflow, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) or other surfactants that are commonly used for 2D-gel electrophoresis can be used to extract proteins, because these surfactants can easily be removed by washing the gel bands/spots with an aqueous solution prior to the ingel digestion of proteins [20,21].…”
Section: Recent Technological Advancements A) Protein Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compatibility of SDS-PAGE with 18 O labeling, allows 18 O labeling to be used for quantifying lipid-associated proteins, like membrane proteins, which are efficiently solubilized by SDS. Protein fractionation by 2D-PAGE is also reported [20]. Applying the proteolytic 18 O labeling technique to the proteins fractionated by 2D-PAGE overcomes the intrinsic problem of 2D-PAGE that is the presence of multiple proteins in any spots.…”
Section: B) Protein Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often utilized to investigate up-regulated proteins and down-regulated proteins in the comparative proteome. 20 In the present paper, the 18 O labeling technique was applied for the preparation of internal standards. To improve the selectivity and specificity, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode in mass spectrometry was used to quantify the unique peptides of Cry1Ab and the corresponding 18 O-labeled peptides in the complex mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%