1993
DOI: 10.1177/0146167293194003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social Identity

Abstract: Some researchers have found that out-group members are responded to more extremely than in-group members; others have found the reveres. The pre authors hypothesized that when importance of group membership was low, out-group extremity would be observed. That is, when the target's actions have few or no implications for the perceive's identity, out-group extremity will occur. In-group extremity was expected when perceivers are high in identification with the in-group. The presence of a threat to one's identity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
255
5
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
28
255
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although I compared an in-group target with a neutral target (and not with an out-group target), those results are consistent with the black-sheep effect (Marquès & Paez, 1994;Marquès, Yzerbyt, & Leyens, 1988). Moreover, they are consistent with the findings of Branscombe et al (1993) that the degree of the evaluator's social identification modulated the black-sheep effect. Such results underline the salience of the evaluator's religious membership in understanding the processes of the religious "halo" effect (Bailey & Garrou, 1983;Isaac, Bailey, & Isaac, 1995) and the religious boomerang effect (Bailey & Young, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Although I compared an in-group target with a neutral target (and not with an out-group target), those results are consistent with the black-sheep effect (Marquès & Paez, 1994;Marquès, Yzerbyt, & Leyens, 1988). Moreover, they are consistent with the findings of Branscombe et al (1993) that the degree of the evaluator's social identification modulated the black-sheep effect. Such results underline the salience of the evaluator's religious membership in understanding the processes of the religious "halo" effect (Bailey & Garrou, 1983;Isaac, Bailey, & Isaac, 1995) and the religious boomerang effect (Bailey & Young, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Also, the more people identify with their ingroup, the more their thoughts and behaviours will be guided by what is in the best interest of the ingroup as a whole (Doosje et al, 1999, p. 85). On the other hand, the thoughts and behaviours of people who do not strongly identify with their ingroup are generally much more driven by personal considerations (Branscombe, Wann, Noel, & Coleman, 1993;Branscombe & Wann, 1994;Branscombe et al, 1999). In the current research, effects were stronger for high identifiers, suggesting the phenomenon of intergroup whistle-blowing to be strongly driven by group-based considerations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the severity of judgment and punishment attributed to ingroup perpetrators is obviously commensurated with several factors such as a clear intention to harm showed by the transgressors (Wang et al 2016;Marques et al 2001b;Abrams et al 2000), the strength of identification with the ingroup (Biernat et al 1999;Branscombe et al 1993;Rullo et al 2015Rullo et al , 2017Otten 2009;Begue 2001) or the impact of the transgression on the overall group' s stereotype (Biernat et al 1999;Castano et al 2002;Abrams et al 2000).…”
Section: Forgiveness Of Ingroup Transgressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%