2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03238-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-house validation of AF4-MALS-UV for polystyrene nanoplastic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeatability was studied for the D geo and t r for MALS and UV detectors, respectively. The results (Table 2 , top) confirmed that both detectors showed a repeatability within range of acceptance (RSD = 1–20%) [ 33 , 35 ]. A noticeable tendency is the increasing precision in the MALS detector, with the increase of the standard size, agreeing with the increasing sensibility of the equipment for higher sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Repeatability was studied for the D geo and t r for MALS and UV detectors, respectively. The results (Table 2 , top) confirmed that both detectors showed a repeatability within range of acceptance (RSD = 1–20%) [ 33 , 35 ]. A noticeable tendency is the increasing precision in the MALS detector, with the increase of the standard size, agreeing with the increasing sensibility of the equipment for higher sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although there are publications that explore the use of the AF4 to obtain size information of NPLs [ 32 , 33 ], there is still a lack of validated methodologies to apply in this field [ 11 , 24 ], also for the validation of standards in aqueous solution. Reference materials are being developed and validated methodologies; alternatives to SEM and TEM are needed for their measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards AF4-MALS, Battistini et al successfully validated an AF4-MALS method for the identication and quantication of nanosized PS particles (20-200 nm) at a LOD of 15-33 mg mL À1 . 94 The same accounts for the protocol of Bocca et al that was also able to quantify PS NPs (20-200 nm) at a LOD of 50 mg mL À1 . 101 However, both methods are limited to nanoplastics that present UV absorbance.…”
Section: Critical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The morphology of an environmental micro/nanoplastic (MNPs) particle can be visually characterized by microscopy methods such as scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. To determine the size of MNPs, there are scattering methods such as dynamic light scattering (DLS), asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering or total organic carbon (AF 4 -MALS or AF 4 - TOC), and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) . Spectroscopy methods used for chemical identification of MNPs include surface enhanced Raman (SERS), , Raman tweezers, , Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and photoinduced forced microscopy (PiFM) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%