2012
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2012.2198089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Layer Multibuffer Framework for Rate-Controlled Scalable Video Coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since VBR controllers do not need to meet strict short-term rate constraints (as already pointed out in Section 1), another successful VBR approach has been proposed that aims at providing improved quality consistency subject to a long-term rate constraint by producing smooth QP variations according to the actual rate and distortion produced in already encoded frames. For a review of the most relevant CBR and VBR controllers designed for video coding standards prior to HEVC the reader is referred to [15,16].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, since VBR controllers do not need to meet strict short-term rate constraints (as already pointed out in Section 1), another successful VBR approach has been proposed that aims at providing improved quality consistency subject to a long-term rate constraint by producing smooth QP variations according to the actual rate and distortion produced in already encoded frames. For a review of the most relevant CBR and VBR controllers designed for video coding standards prior to HEVC the reader is referred to [15,16].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other alternative QP adjustment models already tested on H.264/AVC video coding for VBR applications, such as those that produce smooth QP variations relying on the actual rate and distortion of previously encoded frames [16,30], have not been applied yet to HEVC. This kind of QP control strategy is followed in this paper.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these approaches might be used in almost any application scenario, alternative RCAs have been designed to meet the specific demands of certain applications, such as video streaming and broadcast [51,52,53,54], digital storage [55,56,57,58], and video conferencing [59,60,61,62,63]. As already pointed out in the introduction section, for the particular case of video conferencing, the proposed RCAs aim at a short-term TBR adjustment for buffer overflow and underflow prevention by means of a QP regulation at MB level [59,60] and, in some cases, at row-of-MB level [61,62] in order to improve the R-D performance at the expense of higher bit rate fluctuations.…”
Section: Rate Control For Video Conferencing Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RC problem for hierarchical GOP structures has been studied extensively in H.264/AVC and SVC (the reader can be referred to [7] and [8] for details), but only a few RC algorithms have been proposed for the HEVC standard, of which those described in [9] and [10] are highlighted. Specifically, the algorithm proposed by Li et al in [10], in which a novel R-Lagrange multiplier (λ) model for bit rate regulation is presented, has been adopted by the JCTVC as the new reference RC algorithm in [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%