In pursuit of food system integrity: the situational prevention of food fraud enterprise

Abstract

There is much talk surrounding food fraud policy, and while there is convergence around the need to 'do something about it', there can be divergence around how this should be done as seen in the decisions and actions of concerned stakeholders. However, underpinning the policy agendas in relation to food fraud there is an aim to prevent (or at least reduce) food fraud, crime and harms, to improve the integrity of the food system. This article develops a mode of analysis that integrates 'enterprise theory' with 'situational prevention theory' to develop an understanding of how food frauds are situated actions, shaped by contingent enterprise conditions that influence how food frauds are organised and why decisions to offend become rational. We apply this integrated framework to the Spanish olive oil market. Drawing on data collected on market conditions and case study analyses of particular frauds to better understand the situated nature of food frauds we suggest mechanisms that could be used to prevent fraud in particular situations under these conditions. We conclude that this mode of thinking and analysis can be applied to a range of frauds across different food networks.

Integrity of Organic Foods and Their Suppliers: Fraud Vulnerability Across Chains

“…This culturally embedded behavior perpetuates unethical practice. It also works contagiously, as businesses that may be disadvantaged through such practices are forced to "swim with the tide", eventually resulting in an "unethical slippery slope" [20], with some sectors becoming more contaminated than others. Table 2.…”

Fraud in Food Produts

“…It is accepted that food fraud is well-defined as an illegal mistake to obtain economic gains through food (Lord et al, 2017). Fraud is the term that applies to any practice that is not universally accepted, to be applied without the consent of official regulatory bodies, leading to changes in an edible product, always for profit disrespecting consumer rights (Kolicheski, 1994).…”

Moving from a compliance‐based to an integrity‐based organizational climate in the food supply chain

“…Kendall et al. (2018) describe integrity as “the reliability, trustworthiness, transparency, morality and ethical conduct of actors and stakeholders in the food supply chain.” Lord, Spencer, Albanese, and Elizondo (2017, p. 499) propose that for integrity to be present in supply chains there needs to be a redefinition of the “responses, actions and preferences of market actors to external pressures and drivers around ethical practice.” Therefore, food integrity as a research area has legal, moral, and ethical dimensions (Manning, 2017a). Written in the aftermath of the 2013 European horsemeat incident, the U.K. Elliott Review (HM Government, 2014) into the integrity and assurance of food supply networks stated that food integrity was not only concerned with the nature, substance, quality, and safety of food, but also captured other aspects of food production such as “the way it has been sourced, procured, and distributed and being honest about those areas to consumers.” Wang et al.…”