2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Search of Critically Endangered Species: The Current Situation of Two Tiny Salamander Species in the Neotropical Mountains of Mexico

Abstract: Worldwide, one in every three species of amphibian is endangered, 39 species have gone extinct in the last 500 years and another 130 species are suspected to have gone extinct in recent decades. Of the amphibians, salamanders have the highest portion of their species in one of the risk categories, even higher than the frogs. To date there have been few studies that have used recent field data to examine the status of populations of endangered salamanders. In this study we evaluate the current situation of two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more data are needed based on field surveys (i.e. surveying canopy microhabitats, extending sampling effort to the dry season) to be able to provide a reliable assessment of their level of risk (see Sandoval-Comte et al [ 29 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more data are needed based on field surveys (i.e. surveying canopy microhabitats, extending sampling effort to the dry season) to be able to provide a reliable assessment of their level of risk (see Sandoval-Comte et al [ 29 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results point to the former for these amphibian assemblages, while some studies elsewhere, for other types of system, have shown the latter to apply (Keith et al 2011). It has long been known that sampling size affects the outcomes of biodiversity studies (Preston 1960), species-specific sampling (Sandoval-Comte et al 2012) and of community analyses (Lande et al 2003). Although we compared the same number of sites, the distribution of individuals varied between the two years, seemingly reflecting environmental variation driving the community dynamics (Grøtan et al 2012, Guo et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact collection localities were determined using a global positioning system and the microhabitat where the individual was found was noted. To compare the observed abundance between sites, we calculated the rate of encounter [23] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%