2018
DOI: 10.1134/s106816201804009x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Silico Analysis of Peptide Potential Biological Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, bioinformatic databases and software represent basic tools in the research on biologically active peptides, e.g., those derived from food. Their role was described in several reviews [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The BIOPEP-UWM™ (formerly BIOPEP) database of bioactive peptides is one of these tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, bioinformatic databases and software represent basic tools in the research on biologically active peptides, e.g., those derived from food. Their role was described in several reviews [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The BIOPEP-UWM™ (formerly BIOPEP) database of bioactive peptides is one of these tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, bioinformatic studies, such as docking techniques, present an economical, reliable, and straightforward approach to identify candidate ligands against key proteins involved in the process of adipogenesis. Databases of BAPs are reported, providing information necessary to construct new algorithms for predicting biological functions [ 22 , 23 ]. This article provides molecular evidence for the potential ligand bioactivity of peptides derived from the in silico hydrolysis of rice proteins, specifically glutelin and prolamin fractions, that showed high affinity for the antiadipogenic areas of the PPARγ receptor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Peptide Ranker is used for evaluating the peptide bioactivity, which scores the peptide bioactivity based on amino acids (AA) composition and rankings. Scores >0.5 indicate potential bioactivities, when higher scores manifested higher probability and lower false positive (Kalmykova et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%