2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico evaluation of stress distribution after vertebral body augmentation with conventional acrylics, composites and glass polyalkenoate cements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FE model incorporates a simplified but patient-specific mechanical model of the vertebra, with only compressive loading and prophylactic vertebroplasty simulated. This has the advantage that multiple treatment scenarios can be rapidly computed and compared, which is considered valid and well-accepted for the accurate prediction of compressive strength and fracture risk [ 39 , 63 ]. It is recommended, however, that a conclusive assessment of treatment effectiveness be verified through the simulation of functional spinal units (FSUs) including fractured vertebrae in order to assess fracture risk at adjacent or remote levels, incorporating spectra of multi-axial loading and age-related daily activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The FE model incorporates a simplified but patient-specific mechanical model of the vertebra, with only compressive loading and prophylactic vertebroplasty simulated. This has the advantage that multiple treatment scenarios can be rapidly computed and compared, which is considered valid and well-accepted for the accurate prediction of compressive strength and fracture risk [ 39 , 63 ]. It is recommended, however, that a conclusive assessment of treatment effectiveness be verified through the simulation of functional spinal units (FSUs) including fractured vertebrae in order to assess fracture risk at adjacent or remote levels, incorporating spectra of multi-axial loading and age-related daily activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistently, clinical studies [ 17 , 20 ] reported that the incidence of new fractures was not different after PVP, compared with conservative treatment after one year of follow-up. The major limitations of the biomechanical studies that could explain these divergent conclusions were the limited number of specimens and/or experimental trials (a problem generally associated with cadaveric testing) [ 25 , 26 , 28 32 , 34 36 ] and Finite Element (FE) models that were limited to the study of a single case [ 26 , 29 , 30 ], constructed on the basis of non-realistic, predefined cement distributions [ 24 , 31 , 37 39 ], cement distributions reconstructed from patient radiographs [ 40 ] or peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scans of human cadaveric specimens [ 41 ] with potentially suboptimal cement placement and/or filling strategy. Furthermore, the complex composite properties of cement-augmented bone have been neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PMMA however comes along with specific disadvantageous characteristics. PMMA generates significant heat during the exothermic hardening process and it lacks biologic integration and healing due to induction of chemical or thermal necrosis within the vertebral body [9]. Moreover, the elastic modulus of PMMA exceeds the one of cancellous bone up to the 30-fold [1, 911].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMMA generates significant heat during the exothermic hardening process and it lacks biologic integration and healing due to induction of chemical or thermal necrosis within the vertebral body [9]. Moreover, the elastic modulus of PMMA exceeds the one of cancellous bone up to the 30-fold [1, 911]. This mismatch of mechanical properties might contribute to significantly higher onset of vertebral fractures adjacent to augmented levels [4, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%