2020
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.12476279.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Silico Prediction of Annihilators for Triplet Fusion Upconversion via Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo

Abstract: <div>The energy of the lowest-lying triplet state (T1) relative to the ground and first-excited singlet states (S0, S1) plays a critical role in optical multiexcitonic processes of organic chromophores. Focusing on triplet fusion upconversion, the S0 to T1 energy gap, known as the triplet energy, is difficult to measure experimentally for most molecules of interest. Ab initio predictions can provide a useful alternative, however</div><div>low-scaling electronic structure methods such as the K… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very recent work suggests that using SD trial wave functions with a partially relaxed constraint may reduce the bias significantly, although the accuracy of such a constraint on large systems remains unclear. 129 Alternatively, one could even perform free-projection 37 or release constraint 48 calculations with SD trial wave functions on these small atoms, but this is not a viable option for larger systems. We leave further investigation of these simple systems for future studies and focus on the performance of AFQMC for W4-11 where we use CCSD(T) atomic energies but AFQMC molecular energies.…”
Section: Performance Of Ph-afqmc For Thermochemistry and The Treatmen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recent work suggests that using SD trial wave functions with a partially relaxed constraint may reduce the bias significantly, although the accuracy of such a constraint on large systems remains unclear. 129 Alternatively, one could even perform free-projection 37 or release constraint 48 calculations with SD trial wave functions on these small atoms, but this is not a viable option for larger systems. We leave further investigation of these simple systems for future studies and focus on the performance of AFQMC for W4-11 where we use CCSD(T) atomic energies but AFQMC molecular energies.…”
Section: Performance Of Ph-afqmc For Thermochemistry and The Treatmen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All AFQMC calculations were carried out using single determinant trial wavefunctions as detailed in Ref. 41. The trial wavefunctions (UB3LYP) and integrals for AFQMC were obtained with PySCF v2.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was funded in part by the Columbia Center for Computational Electrochemistry (CCCE). This article is reproduced in part with permission from Chapter 5 of ref .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%