Processing and Sustainability of Beverages 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815259-1.00009-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Analysis Devices for Estimating the Environmental Footprint in Beverages Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a metric factor, expressed as kg CO 2 equivalent, for the evaluation of the negative impact of a methodology that involves the power of the instrument, run time, and emission factor for electricity. 65,66 The carbon footprint for this aforementioned method is computed by the expression provided in ESI S1,† within the HEXAGON tool described by Ballester-Caudet et al in 2019. 66 It equals 0.00659 kg CO 2 equivalent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a metric factor, expressed as kg CO 2 equivalent, for the evaluation of the negative impact of a methodology that involves the power of the instrument, run time, and emission factor for electricity. 65,66 The carbon footprint for this aforementioned method is computed by the expression provided in ESI S1,† within the HEXAGON tool described by Ballester-Caudet et al in 2019. 66 It equals 0.00659 kg CO 2 equivalent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sustainability of an analytical method is governed by minimization of toxic solvents, reduction of wastes, and employment of energy-efficient and cost-effective methodologies, but also on maintaining the reliability of the performance parameters, such as sensitivity, precision, and accuracy [25,26]. In two previous papers [27,28] our group demonstrated that IT-SPME-CapLC-DAD achieves the minimization of the sample pre-treatment step, analysis time, and wastes, the reduction of the analysis costs, and thus, improvement of the analytical and environmental performance. Satisfactory LOD (0.3 ng) and precision (RSD intra-day = 9%, RSD inter-day = 14%) were achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check the best material to immobilize and after to release luminol to the solution, different supports were tested. Based on our experience [1,[19][20][21][22], several solid supports for luminol entrapment were studied: PDMS, zein, and TEOS/MTEOS. Solid supports of PDMS (Figure 4A,B) or PDMS-TEOS (Figure 4C-E) containing luminol were synthetized.…”
Section: Optimization Of Luminol Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%