2008
DOI: 10.1039/b804857f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ atomic force microscopy of zeolite A dissolution

Abstract: In the present study, the {100} surface of zeolite A was exposed to a range of solutions and the response was monitored in real-time by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM). The zeolite dissolves by a well-defined layer process that is characterised by uncorrelated dissolution of units that are structurally unconnected and terrace retreat when building units are inter-connected. This process was observed to be coupled with the formation of nano-squares that are stabilized at the zeolite surface for a period … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is common in classical crystallization, but has never been observed in situ for zeolites. Other groups have inferred this mode of growth using ex situ microscopy images 37 , 38 of LTA surfaces removed from saturated solutions and from in situ dissolution studies 39 in undersaturated media; however, such approaches are incapable of fully resolving the mechanisms of layer nucleation and spreading. On the contrary, we report time-resolved images in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism is common in classical crystallization, but has never been observed in situ for zeolites. Other groups have inferred this mode of growth using ex situ microscopy images 37 , 38 of LTA surfaces removed from saturated solutions and from in situ dissolution studies 39 in undersaturated media; however, such approaches are incapable of fully resolving the mechanisms of layer nucleation and spreading. On the contrary, we report time-resolved images in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though being recognized as one of the rate-limiting mechanisms of overall uptake and release, surface resistance has so far remained beyond direct experimental assessment and observation. This situation is changing with the development of microscopic techniques capable of atomistic resolution [22,36]. The detection and exploration of microstructural details, which might provide support for our model thus appears to be a promising project for future studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The model assumes total blockage of the vast majority of the pore entrances, with only a few pores directly accessible from the outside. Several examples suggesting almost complete blockage of pores over an entire crystal plane can be found in the literature [21,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When assuming the attachment of reactive plasma species on zeolite A, it seems that the preferred binding sites are on {111} surfaces. To the best of our knowledge, there is no direct report of the density of hydroxyl groups on {111} and {100} surfaces, while disputes remain regarding the surface terminations. Therefore, we estimated the hydroxyl density for (100) and (111) surfaces following the cleavage strategy of a previous publication where the most stable positions for both surfaces were calculated . Surprisingly, The calculated density for the (100) surface is 5.63 OH groups nm –2 , much higher than that of the (111) surface (i.e., 2.44 OH groups nm –2 , Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%