1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00027829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ bioassessment of dredging and disposal activities in a contaminated ecosystem: Toronto Harbour

Abstract: The contamination of Toronto Harbour is a very serious problem. The major sources of pollution are the Don River and sewer outflows, as well as industrial, and municipal effluents. The problem is further compounded by perturbations of the toxic sediment caused by dredging, dredge-disposal, navigation, and recreational activities. The impact of contamination and nutrient enrichment was reflected in the sizefractionated primary productivity experiments. Generally, microplankton/netplankton (> 20 im) productivity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sivadasan and Joseph [45], 1995 have opined that in estuarine waters the ratio of Chlorophyll c/Chlorophyll a is often an indication of the crop activities and also points to the environmental health under conditions of external stress. In situ bio assessment of dredging at Toronto harbour had approached the problem by considering the ratios of planktonic abundance in order to differentiate the relative effects of desilting [46]. During the dredging period (moderate to intensive) the values above unity is thence an IMPACTS OF DREDGING 715 indication of rather unhealthy crop as read for surface waters.…”
Section: Chlorophyllc/chlorophyll Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sivadasan and Joseph [45], 1995 have opined that in estuarine waters the ratio of Chlorophyll c/Chlorophyll a is often an indication of the crop activities and also points to the environmental health under conditions of external stress. In situ bio assessment of dredging at Toronto harbour had approached the problem by considering the ratios of planktonic abundance in order to differentiate the relative effects of desilting [46]. During the dredging period (moderate to intensive) the values above unity is thence an IMPACTS OF DREDGING 715 indication of rather unhealthy crop as read for surface waters.…”
Section: Chlorophyllc/chlorophyll Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for using historical dredging data lays in the fact that previous research indicates that concentration levels of metals in sediments increased after dredging. This means that contaminants dispersed by dredging are deposited back onto the new layer of sediments, exposed after excavation [14][15][16]. This creates a potential for future dredging to disperse the contaminants that have been re-deposited.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%