2023
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202301439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Device‐Level TEM Characterization Based on Ultra‐Flexible Multilayer MoS2 Micro‐Cantilever

Abstract: Current state‐of‐the‐art in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization technology has been capable of statically or dynamically nanorobotic manipulating specimens, affording abundant atom‐level material attributes. However, an insurmountable barrier between material attributes investigations and device‐level application explorations exists due to immature in situ TEM manufacturing technology and sufficient external coupled stimulus. These limitations seriously prevent the development of in si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 74 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and synchrotron/laboratory X-ray diffraction are popular methods exploited for studying light responses in MHPs, as these measurements are performed mostly in non-vacuum and open environments where light can be incorporated easily. , Still, AFM and X-ray probes are limited to revealing either morphological or statistical phase information, calling for the use of analytical transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM can simultaneously provide both morphological and phase information, and more importantly, unlock an extremely high spatial resolution (from the atomic to nanometer scales). The recent development of TEM characterization for MHPs has been proven successful with regard to the unprecedented local structure/phase information and insightful knowledge achieved. Nevertheless, it remains an utmost challenge to incorporate a light component into TEM characterization, which has only been tried in only a handful of studies for non-MHP materials systems. Generally, commercially available in situ TEM platform setups can provide controls only on temperature, atmosphere, liquid, , and electrical bias, , restricting the study of any light effects on the transformation and degradation of MHPs. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and synchrotron/laboratory X-ray diffraction are popular methods exploited for studying light responses in MHPs, as these measurements are performed mostly in non-vacuum and open environments where light can be incorporated easily. , Still, AFM and X-ray probes are limited to revealing either morphological or statistical phase information, calling for the use of analytical transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM can simultaneously provide both morphological and phase information, and more importantly, unlock an extremely high spatial resolution (from the atomic to nanometer scales). The recent development of TEM characterization for MHPs has been proven successful with regard to the unprecedented local structure/phase information and insightful knowledge achieved. Nevertheless, it remains an utmost challenge to incorporate a light component into TEM characterization, which has only been tried in only a handful of studies for non-MHP materials systems. Generally, commercially available in situ TEM platform setups can provide controls only on temperature, atmosphere, liquid, , and electrical bias, , restricting the study of any light effects on the transformation and degradation of MHPs. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%