2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000157968.98476.f3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: A comparison of quantitative culture, differential time to positivity, and endoluminal brushing

Abstract: All three techniques had relatively high sensitivity. However, inability to obtain samples via central venous catheters is a major drawback of the differential time to positivity and quantitative blood culture approaches. Differential time to positivity is simple to perform and has high specificity and therefore could be used as a first line approach, with the endoluminal brush reserved for cases where blood cannot be obtained. All lumens of multiple-lumen central venous catheters must be sampled to ensure max… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The early increase of PCT may reflect the colonization of the catheter with subclinical infection ultimately leading to BSI [17]. CRP was discriminative only at 1 day after blood culture collection; even at this point, PCT had a superior diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The early increase of PCT may reflect the colonization of the catheter with subclinical infection ultimately leading to BSI [17]. CRP was discriminative only at 1 day after blood culture collection; even at this point, PCT had a superior diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only tips of RRT catheters were cultured on removal. Catheter lumens can be cultured using endoluminal brush either in situ or after removal in the laboratory or by culturing sections of the catheter (31). Consequently, the rate of endoluminal colonization could have been underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCQBC for the diagnosis of microbial colonization TCQBC has been previously used for detecting microbial colonization of central venous catheters 42 , and for the diagnosis of CRBSI without catheter removal [43][44][45] .…”
Section: Microbiology Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%