2004
DOI: 10.1557/proc-816-k5.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Situ Friction and Pad Topography Measurements During CMP

Abstract: Duel Emission Laser Induced Fluorescence (DELIF) and friction measurements are taken in-situ during CMP to observe slurry flow beneath a model of an integrated circuit (IC) wafer. Friction measurements average around 7.5 lb and multiple frequencies are observed. Slurry film thicknesses on the order of a 10±3µm were observed during CMP of a flat wafer. The film thickness seems uncorrelated to friction measurements except when the pad and wafer rotation speeds are significantly slowed. DELIF has also accurately … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20] Chemical properties were characterized using Fourier transform infrared ͑FTIR͒ spectroscopy, pad stress nonuniformity with scanning ultrasound transmission testing, pad coefficient of friction by various noncommercial instruments, and slurry transport by pad using dual emission laser induced fluorescence. 14,16,[21][22][23][24][25] Pad properties were reported as a function of temperature, soaking time in various solutions, and conditioning treatments. 10,15,[26][27][28][29][30] Different pad types were tested to optimize the removal rate and planarizability for various CMP processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20] Chemical properties were characterized using Fourier transform infrared ͑FTIR͒ spectroscopy, pad stress nonuniformity with scanning ultrasound transmission testing, pad coefficient of friction by various noncommercial instruments, and slurry transport by pad using dual emission laser induced fluorescence. 14,16,[21][22][23][24][25] Pad properties were reported as a function of temperature, soaking time in various solutions, and conditioning treatments. 10,15,[26][27][28][29][30] Different pad types were tested to optimize the removal rate and planarizability for various CMP processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%