2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ immuno-gold nanoparticle network ELISA biosensors for pathogen detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional culturebased assays, which are regarded as the "gold standards" are widely, used by many organizations, especially by regulatory food safety agencies and food companies, because these are accepted in global regulation for trade and enable detection of low levels of pathogens [77]. However, standardized ways of detecting foodborne pathogenic bacteria by regulatory organizations (i.e., ISO, WHO, FDA) are often labor intensive and time consuming because of the sequence of the following processes: (i) pre-enrichment in non-selective broth (e.g., buffered peptone water, trypticase soy broth); (ii) selective bacterial enrichment using selective broth (e.g., Rappaport- This entire process usually requires 5 to 7 days to complete.…”
Section: Salmonella Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional culturebased assays, which are regarded as the "gold standards" are widely, used by many organizations, especially by regulatory food safety agencies and food companies, because these are accepted in global regulation for trade and enable detection of low levels of pathogens [77]. However, standardized ways of detecting foodborne pathogenic bacteria by regulatory organizations (i.e., ISO, WHO, FDA) are often labor intensive and time consuming because of the sequence of the following processes: (i) pre-enrichment in non-selective broth (e.g., buffered peptone water, trypticase soy broth); (ii) selective bacterial enrichment using selective broth (e.g., Rappaport- This entire process usually requires 5 to 7 days to complete.…”
Section: Salmonella Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] CONCLUSIONS Immunological assays with different readouts have been extensively reported for the detection of Salmonella using magnetic particles. [27][28][29][30] However, in the literature there are no conclusive results about the influence of the size of the magnetic particles on the immunomagnetic separation and detection of Salmonella, as well as matrix effect studies. This paper addressed a comparison of the performance of both magnetic micro and nanoparticles in the immunomagnetic separation step for Salmonella using different media and samples by bacteria plating and microscopy studies.…”
Section: Preferred Position For Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing bacteria detection methods such as culturing (Allen et al 2004), immunology assays (ELISA) (Jain et al 2012;Cho and Irudayaraj 2013) and molecular biology methods (PCR) (Opet and Levin 2013; Liu et al 2013), are limited by low sensitivity, complex operation (Wang et al 2007) or high costs (Mollasalehi and Yazdanparast 2013). The requirement for big equipment is a major bottleneck for realtime and rapid detection of bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%