2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Local Contact Angle Measurement in a CO2–Brine–Sand System Using Microfocused X-ray CT

Abstract: The wettability of porous media is of major interest in a broad range of natural and engineering applications. The wettability of a fluid on a solid surface is usually evaluated by the contact angle between them. While in situ local contact angle measurements are complicated by the topology of porous media, which can make it difficult to use traditional methods, recent advances in microfocused X-ray computed tomography (micro-CT) and image processing techniques have made it possible to measure contact angles o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence the dynamic contact angle ( α=29°) slowly relaxes from a value close to the one observed for quasi‐static drainage ( α=27°) toward the equilibrium value of α=42° (Figure b). For the first time, we have derived dynamic contact angles by treating them as a fitting parameter between the macroscopic pressure difference PnPw and Laplace pressure P c , which at first glance might be more error prone than recent approaches to measure contact angles directly in the CT images [ Andrew et al ., ; Lv et al ., ]. But there are several arguments in favor of our chosen approach: (i) A direct assessment of contact angles requires manual measurements of contact angle at many locations in perpendicular planes along the three‐phase contact line, which is prohibitive for the high number of analyzed CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence the dynamic contact angle ( α=29°) slowly relaxes from a value close to the one observed for quasi‐static drainage ( α=27°) toward the equilibrium value of α=42° (Figure b). For the first time, we have derived dynamic contact angles by treating them as a fitting parameter between the macroscopic pressure difference PnPw and Laplace pressure P c , which at first glance might be more error prone than recent approaches to measure contact angles directly in the CT images [ Andrew et al ., ; Lv et al ., ]. But there are several arguments in favor of our chosen approach: (i) A direct assessment of contact angles requires manual measurements of contact angle at many locations in perpendicular planes along the three‐phase contact line, which is prohibitive for the high number of analyzed CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of micron-resolution imaging tools has made it possible to measure fluid/fluid interface curvature (Andrew et al, 2014b;Armstrong et al, 2012;Singh et al, 2016) and contact angle (Andrew et al, 2014b;Klise et al, 2016;Scanziani et al, 2017) between immiscible fluids at the pore scale. Also, recent studies have employed some of these methods for the in situ characterization of wettability and pore-scale multiphase displacements in natural porous media (Garing et al, 2017;Khishvand et al, 2017Khishvand et al, , 2016Lv et al, 2016Lv et al, , 2017Tudek et al, 2017). However, measuring contact angle and fluid/fluid interface curvature in typical microcomputed tomography (CT) images with low resolution (large voxel size) and for complex rocks is still not a routine and all these methods are either cumbersome or may introduce significant errors generated by voxelization artifacts.…”
Section: 1029/2017wr022124mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, pore-scale X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) imaging has been widely used in geologically related studies (Al-Khulaifi et al, 2018;Al-Menhali et al, 2016;Andrew et al, 2014a;Berg et al, 2013;Blunt et al, 2013;Cnudde & Boone, 2013;Ketcham & Carlson, 2001;Lai et al, 2015;Lin et al, 2018;Lin, Al-Khulaifi, et al, 2016;Lin, Neethling, et al, 2016;Qajar & Arns, 2016;Reyes et al, 2017;Reynolds et al, 2017;Saif et al, 2017;Schlüter et al, 2016). In particular, imaging of multiphase flow in porous rock has been performed, covering a wide range of topics, including wettability characterization based on contact angle measurement, relative permeability, and curvature analysis in the pore space to estimate capillary pressure (Akbarabadi & Piri, 2013;Alhammadi et al, 2017;AlRatrout et al, 2017;Andrew et al, 2014b;Armstrong, Pentland, et al, 2012;Arns et al, 2003;Berg et al, 2016;Gao et al, 2017;Garing et al, 2017;Herring et al, 2017;Krevor et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2017;Lv et al, 2017;Norouzi Apourvari & Arns, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%