2016 22nd International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/therminic.2016.7749057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ monitoring of interface delamination by local thermal transducers exemplified for a flip-chip package

Abstract: We have developed a novel, rapid, robust and non-destructive experimental technique for in-situ monitoring of delamination of interfaces for electronic packages. The method is based on a simple thermal transducer matrix of so-called THIXELS (thermal pixels) which allows a spatially resolved real-time image of the current status of delamination. The transducers are small metal wire meanders which are driven and electrically read out using the well-known 3-omega method. This method has special advantages over ot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermal methods use thermal monitoring to assess column dimensions through the heat generated by the grout curing process [32][33][34]. This real-time, non-destructive technique provides insight into column integrity and size, but can be affected by soil types and hydration reactions, as noted by Wunderle et al [35]. The challenge is to refine these methods to reduce error margins and adapt them to different geotechnical contexts.…”
Section: Diameter/geometry Confirmationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal methods use thermal monitoring to assess column dimensions through the heat generated by the grout curing process [32][33][34]. This real-time, non-destructive technique provides insight into column integrity and size, but can be affected by soil types and hydration reactions, as noted by Wunderle et al [35]. The challenge is to refine these methods to reduce error margins and adapt them to different geotechnical contexts.…”
Section: Diameter/geometry Confirmationmentioning
confidence: 99%