SAE Technical Paper Series 2002
DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-2872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Situ NH3 Generation for SCR NOx Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Various sources of ammonia for this application have been proposed from on-board ammonia tanks, to decomposition of urea, to catalytic generation of ammonia in the exhaust stream. 23,24 The ammonia using airship could use the secondary lifting gas for SCR.…”
Section: Cuse Of Ammonia As a Means To Limit Nox Emissions Through Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Various sources of ammonia for this application have been proposed from on-board ammonia tanks, to decomposition of urea, to catalytic generation of ammonia in the exhaust stream. 23,24 The ammonia using airship could use the secondary lifting gas for SCR.…”
Section: Cuse Of Ammonia As a Means To Limit Nox Emissions Through Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent tests have shown the ability to control the ammonia slip problem and raised the possibility that the ammonia needed for the catalytic reduction reaction can actually be produced on board from the propulsion fuel, thus obviating the urea reservoir and taking the vehicle operator out of the emissionscontrol loop (25). Unfortunately, the fuel economy penalty with these prototype units generally exceeds 15% (26 ).…”
Section: Technologies Expected To Be Proven and Capable Of Commercialization By 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent tests have shown the ability to control this problem (Sluder and West 2002) and raised the possibility that the ammonia needed for the catalytic reduction reaction can actually be produced on-board from the propulsion fuel, thus obviating the urea reservoir and taking the vehicle operator "out of the loop" of emissions control. Unfortunately, the fuel economy penalty with these prototype units generally exceeds 15% (Ogunwumi et al 2002). Most NO x retrofit programs are not expected to survive after 15 ppm sulfur fuel becomes universally available and the requirements of the EPA consent decree on NO x emission compliance are met.…”
Section: Technologies Expected To Be Proven/capable Of Commercializatmentioning
confidence: 99%