Nonequilibrium aerostatic flight conditions, caused by the delivery of a large payload, represent a significant engineering challenge to overcome in the design of large scale airships and impediments to their overall financial success. Gaseous ammonia, used as a portion of the airship's lifting gas, i.e. "negative ballast" and partly as a fuel or as a means to reduce NOx emissions of typical airship power plants is a relatively safe and practical way to meet the challenge of nonequilibrium aerostatic flight. Gaseous ammonia used as a secondary lifting gas can be vented quickly to restore the airship to aerostatic equilibrium. Thus the use of ammonia as a lifting gas is primarily used to provide aerostatic lift of the payload only. This concept is contrasted with conventional means of dealing with nonequilibrium aerostatic flight such as exhaust water recovery, vectored thrust, primary lifting gas venting and aerodynamic lift as well as less conventional means such as primary lifting gas compression or air liquefaction and hot-air or steam ballonets. In order to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the use of ammonia as a secondary lifting gas, system-level measures of performance for the various concepts and generic to airship type, size, and configuration are developed for comparison purposes. An airship sizing MATLAB code based on historical design data is used to compare various concepts to determine which concept offers the best performing airship in order to accomplish a mission. The model mission is based on DARPA's WALRUS program requirements which are based on the capabilities of the C-130J-30 cargo airplane.