2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2019.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ observations of the effect of the ZDDP tribofilm growth on micropitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al [10] studied the influence of contact severity on micropitting, and the results of simulation and experiment illustrated that the final surface damage is influenced by the combination of micropitting and mild wear. Lately, a series of in-situ measurements of micropitting performed by Ueda et al [11] strongly supported this competition mechanism. It is presented that higher Zinc Dialkyldithiophosphate (ZDDP) concentrations cause more micropitting and less surface wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhou et al [10] studied the influence of contact severity on micropitting, and the results of simulation and experiment illustrated that the final surface damage is influenced by the combination of micropitting and mild wear. Lately, a series of in-situ measurements of micropitting performed by Ueda et al [11] strongly supported this competition mechanism. It is presented that higher Zinc Dialkyldithiophosphate (ZDDP) concentrations cause more micropitting and less surface wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…where is total load, is sliding distance in a certain time, is the material hardness and denotes wear coefficient. Considering the sliding distance and the contact area in a certain time, the removed layer height ℎ is, ℎ = ̅ , (11) where ̅ denotes the mean pressure defined as the ratio of normal load to contact area, is the relative sliding speed. One can replace the time by the contact length , the grid pressure ( , ) and the speed of the current surface , so the equation becomes…”
Section: Wear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These asperity stresses occur in high pressure contacts when surfaces are separated only by very thin lubricant films and are thus becoming more prevalent as lubricant viscosities are reduced in the quest for improved fuel economy. Although micropitting is primarily a mechanically driven process it has been found to be accelerated by ZDDPs [9][10][11]. This is because ZDDPs inhibit running-in, by forming tribofilms so rapidly that asperities present on the surfaces from manufacture do not have time to be smoothed or rounded.…”
Section: Zddpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would imply that in many practical situations with moderately rough virgin surfaces there may be no detrimental effect on the shape of the Stribeck curve and no additional asperity stresses caused directly by the roughness of the ZDDP film itself. This is separate from the well-established mechanism in which ZDDP tribolfilms increase severity of asperity stresses through suppression of running-in and in turn, increase the risk of micropitting [41][42][43].…”
Section: Tribofilm Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 76%