2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ uranium stabilization by microbial metabolites

Abstract: Soil contaminated with U was the focus of this study in order to develop in-situ, U bio-immobilization technology. We have demonstrated microbial production of a metal chelating biopolymer, pyomelanin, in U contaminated soil from the Tims Branch area of the Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) as a result of tyrosine amendments. Bacterial densities of pyomelanin producers were >106 cells/g wet soil.Pyomelanin demonstrated U chelating and mineral binding capacities at pH 4 and 7. In laboratory s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retained U was associated with acid soluble and organic fractions of the wetland sediments, and the U L 3 -edge XANES spectra of the retained U are nearly identical to that of uranyl acetate (U(VI)). These results might indicate that the molecular mechanisms for the high U retention onto the SRS wetland sediments would be either chemical sorption or bonding with NOM-like humate colloids (Wan et al 2011) or accumulation in the wetland plants (Hinton et al, 2005;Knox et al, 2008) that constituted a significant source of the NOM in the SRS wetland sediments. n/a = not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The retained U was associated with acid soluble and organic fractions of the wetland sediments, and the U L 3 -edge XANES spectra of the retained U are nearly identical to that of uranyl acetate (U(VI)). These results might indicate that the molecular mechanisms for the high U retention onto the SRS wetland sediments would be either chemical sorption or bonding with NOM-like humate colloids (Wan et al 2011) or accumulation in the wetland plants (Hinton et al, 2005;Knox et al, 2008) that constituted a significant source of the NOM in the SRS wetland sediments. n/a = not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…long term U immobilization in wetlands include the chemical and/or microbial reduction of soluble U(VI) ions to fairly insoluble U(IV) species (Kalin et al, 2005;Lovley et al, 1991;Noubactep et al, 2006;Turick et al, 2008), mineral precipitation, sorption onto NOM (Wan et al, 2011), ion exchange or sorption to sediment minerals (Akber et al, 1992;Dong et al, 2012;Grybos et al, 2007), and accumulation in plants (Hinton et al, 2005;Knox et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical and physical techniques for waste treatment or removal of U are challenging and expensive. An alternative method for U remediation is microbially mediated, in situ U immobilization, which has added benefits of reduced cost and environmental friendliness relative to other approaches (3,4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the amount of iron assimilated by the bacterium may not be solely dependent on the concentration of the Fe 2ϩ generated but may be influenced by the polymerized status of the reducing agent or the nature of a HGA-melanin complex. Other pyomelanins present in the soil have been linked to the sequestration of other metals, including uranium, molybdenum, lead, bismuth, and arsenic (54). In thinking about the ferric iron reduction reaction itself, it is possible that HGA and HGA-melanin do not always act alone; e.g., a secreted protease of L. pneumophila that degrades transferrin (55) may improve the access of HGA to the ferric iron in that host iron chelate.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%