2022
DOI: 10.1108/tqm-08-2021-0230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-store technologies to improve customer experience and interaction: an exploratory investigation in Italian travel agencies

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to deepen understanding of the role played by new technological tools used in customer–travel agency (TA) interactions by analysing the TA owner/managers' perceptions, pre- and post-Covid-19, regarding the effectiveness of in-store traditional and innovative tools.Design/methodology/approachThis exploratory study is based on a questionnaire-based survey conducted among Italian TAs and distributed via email from September 2020 to January 2021.FindingsThe study highlights how, even among T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(184 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased adoption of SM by TAs is closely linked to the significant awareness that emerges from the study about their prospective or predicted effectiveness in the The motivations that lead TAs to increase their SM usage (RQ2) seem to be in line with other studies, namely those on corporate brand promotion (Barcoe and Whelan, 2018;Asongu and Odhiambo, 2019), on relational purposes (Ali Abbasi et al, 2022;Foltean et al, 2019) such as activation of value co-creation processes (Yang et al, 2014), improvement of information quality (Albattat, 2020;Sharma et al, 2020;€ Ozturan et al, 2019), technical assistance during the holiday (Fernandes et al, 2016;Asongu and Odhiambo, 2019) and creating communities with customers (Roth-Cohen and Lahav, 2019). The significant values attributed to relational motivations emphasize the need to maintain contact with customers, which remains a critical success factor for traditional TAs (Dini et al, 2022), as well. Unlike other studies (S ¸engel et al, 2021;Oji et al, 2017) the purely economic/income motivations, although present, do not seem to play a decisive role in the choice of using social networks (Bocconcelli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increased adoption of SM by TAs is closely linked to the significant awareness that emerges from the study about their prospective or predicted effectiveness in the The motivations that lead TAs to increase their SM usage (RQ2) seem to be in line with other studies, namely those on corporate brand promotion (Barcoe and Whelan, 2018;Asongu and Odhiambo, 2019), on relational purposes (Ali Abbasi et al, 2022;Foltean et al, 2019) such as activation of value co-creation processes (Yang et al, 2014), improvement of information quality (Albattat, 2020;Sharma et al, 2020;€ Ozturan et al, 2019), technical assistance during the holiday (Fernandes et al, 2016;Asongu and Odhiambo, 2019) and creating communities with customers (Roth-Cohen and Lahav, 2019). The significant values attributed to relational motivations emphasize the need to maintain contact with customers, which remains a critical success factor for traditional TAs (Dini et al, 2022), as well. Unlike other studies (S ¸engel et al, 2021;Oji et al, 2017) the purely economic/income motivations, although present, do not seem to play a decisive role in the choice of using social networks (Bocconcelli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…, 2022; Foltean et al ., 2019) such as activation of value co-creation processes (Yang et al ., 2014), improvement of information quality (Albattat, 2020; Sharma et al ., 2020; Özturan et al ., 2019), technical assistance during the holiday (Fernandes et al ., 2016; Asongu and Odhiambo, 2019) and creating communities with customers (Roth-Cohen and Lahav, 2019). The significant values ​​attributed to relational motivations emphasize the need to maintain contact with customers, which remains a critical success factor for traditional TAs (Dini et al ., 2022), as well. Unlike other studies (Şengel et al ., 2021; Oji et al ., 2017) the purely economic/income motivations, although present, do not seem to play a decisive role in the choice of using social networks (Bocconcelli et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical environment has become part of the omnichannel context (Alexander and Cano, 2020; Gao et al , 2021), and service marketers need to consider customer experiences within the “phygital” reality of customer worlds. Recent literature asserts that digital tools such as virtual reality, artificial intelligence and augmented reality can enhance and improve the physical environment (Canhoto et al , 2023; Dini et al , 2022). However, there is a need to redress the balance and consider what the physical context brings to customer experience in a world where we increasingly spend more time in the digital space.…”
Section: Rationale For Exploring the Effect Of The Physical Context O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For years, the tourism consumer market was focused on travel agencies, which today have limited service options and cannot fully meet the individual needs of tourists (Wang, 2020). However, users still place more trust in agencies and travel agents choosing personal contact and advice with the chance of getting answers to all potential questions, whereas many agencies still consider the printed catalogs the most effective on-site sales tool (Dini et al, 2022). What particularly stands out in the technological development in travel agencies business is the emergence of an increasing number of Online Travel Agencies, which do not have a physical place of business like traditional travel agencies (Wicaksono & Maharani, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%