2007
DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v32i2.5258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In support of water-resource planning – highlighting key management issues using DRIFT: A case study

Abstract: The DRIFT (downstream response to imposed flow transformation) methodology was applied as part of a comprehensive Reserve determination study on the Olifants-Doring River, Western Cape, South Africa. DRIFT was used to provide flow scenarios, and descriptive summaries of their consequences in terms of the condition of the river ecosystem, for examination and comparison by decision makers, managers and users. The methods used and results obtained in that study are presented and discussed in the light of the stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ecological integrity for main rivers was mapped using three existing datasets: (i) present ecological status (Kleynhans, 2000; Nel et al. , 2007) based on an expert‐derived assessment of six criteria (flow, inundation, water quality, stream bed condition, introduced instream biota, riparian or stream bank condition); (ii) River Health Programme monitoring sites that use aquatic community and habitat indicators at a site level (River Health Programme, 2006); and (iii) aerial habitat integrity surveys at 5‐km stretches along four rivers selected for environmental flow assessment (Brown et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological integrity for main rivers was mapped using three existing datasets: (i) present ecological status (Kleynhans, 2000; Nel et al. , 2007) based on an expert‐derived assessment of six criteria (flow, inundation, water quality, stream bed condition, introduced instream biota, riparian or stream bank condition); (ii) River Health Programme monitoring sites that use aquatic community and habitat indicators at a site level (River Health Programme, 2006); and (iii) aerial habitat integrity surveys at 5‐km stretches along four rivers selected for environmental flow assessment (Brown et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of DRIFT to assess EWRs for perennial rivers is now well documented (Brown et al, 2006(Brown et al, , 2008King and Brown, 2010;King et al, 2014) and is not repeated. Rather, we focus here on its application to non-perennial rivers and the necessity to adjust the approach, largely due to the paucity of data on such systems but also because of their different nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to implementing such a strategy, the plans should be subjected to a full environmental impact assessment that also assesses the impacts that such weirs would have on a broader range of biotic and physical attributes. Monitoring the outcomes of conservation actions resulting from this assessment and planning should include indicators evaluating the health of rivers and groundwater systems through for example the River Health Programme (Roux, 2001), setting environmental flows (Arthington et al ., 2010) and implementation of comprehensive Ecological Reserve determination studies (Brown et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%