1991
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90072-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of polyhydroxybutyrate and of polyhydroxybutyrate reinforced with hydroxyapatite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
169
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
6
169
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, biocomposites of these polymers with calcium orthophosphates showed a good biocompatibility both in vitro and in vivo [94,[340][341][342][343][344][345]. Both bioactivity and mechanical properties of these biocomposites can be tailored by varying the volume percentage of calcium orthophosphates.…”
Section: Apatite-based Biocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, biocomposites of these polymers with calcium orthophosphates showed a good biocompatibility both in vitro and in vivo [94,[340][341][342][343][344][345]. Both bioactivity and mechanical properties of these biocomposites can be tailored by varying the volume percentage of calcium orthophosphates.…”
Section: Apatite-based Biocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works also presented increase of approximately 30% of the mechanical properties by addition of HA particles [14,15]; in both cases the enhancement of the mechanical properties was related to the utilization of nanosized particles and the good distribution in the matrix. Doyle et al [7] reported a reduction of the mechanical strength of PHB/HA composites by addition of HA particles. The composites were formed via injection molding of PHB and PHB/HA mixtures at 170 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHB is of particular interest for bone tissue application as it was demonstrated to produce a consistent favorable bone tissue adaptation response with no evidence of an undesirable chronic inflammatory response after implantation periods of up to 12 months. Bone is formed close to the material and subsequently becomes highly organized, with up to 80% of the implant surface lying in direct apposition to new bone [7]. PHB-based biomaterials have also been related to be piezoelectric and promote bone growth in vivo [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa hipótese foi confirmada à histologia como descrito a seguir. Além disso, após a descalcificação, o material ainda era rígido, o que dificultou a microtomia, permitindo a atuação das forças de arrasto desse procedimento no PHB em degradação (DOYLE et al, 1991). A contração dos tecidos durante o processamento histológico (DENISSEN & GROOT, 1990) também pode ter atuado no PHB em degradação na interface, contribuindo para a separação.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Aos 45 e 90 dias, não era possível delimitar 37,5 e 31,25% das margens dos quadrantes, respectivamente, onde não mais existia o halo menos radiopaco que o osso próximo ao defeito e os defeitos diminuíram de tamanho. Portanto, foi constatada a neoformação óssea nas bordas do compósito, reforçando a biocompatibilidade e indicando a osseointegração (DOYLE et al, 1991;KNOWLES et al, 1992;LUKLINSKA & BONFIELD, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified