A total of 435 clinical isolates of anaerobes were tested with a broth microdilution method to determine the activity of BAY y 3118 compared with those of other agents against anaerobic bacteria. All strains ofBacteroides capilosus, PrevoteUa spp., Porphyromonas spp., Fusobacterium spp., Clostridium spp., Eubacterium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., and VeiloneUa parvula were susceptible (MICs of -2 ,ug/ml) to BAY y 3118. Against the 315 strains of the Bacteroidesfragilis group, five strains required elevated MICs (.4 ,ug/ml) of BAYy 3118. Only imipenem and metronidazole were active against all anaerobes. Overall, BAY y 3118 was more active than ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, piperacillin, cefotaxime, and clindamycin against the test isolates.Newer fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents such as ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin, lomefloxacin, and pefloxacin have been shown to have good activity against aerobic bacteria but usually have poor activity against most anaerobes, particularly the Bacteroides fragilis group (1,3,6,7,11 Our results confirm and extend the data regarding the in vitro activity of BAY y 3118 against anaerobes, particularly against those in the B. fragilis group. In the present study, we identified 5 of 435 (1%) anaerobes which were resistant (MICs of .4 ,ug/ml) to BAY y 3118; all were strains of the B. fragilis group. All other anaerobes were susceptible. In a similar study,