In-Vitro and in-Vivo Tools in Drug Delivery Research for Optimum Clinical Outcomes 2018
DOI: 10.1201/b22448-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Vitro and In-Vivo Tools in Emerging Drug Delivery Scenario: Challenges and Updates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo studies, though more complex than in vitro ones, demand techniques not so accessible such as PET/SPECT, but provide a more “realistic” picture of the fate of the NCs and encapsulated drugs, which has a direct impact on the evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of the NCs and their clinical relevance. In vitro studies on the other hand are more accessible in terms of availability of techniques, which are usually fluorescence based, and provide a useful pre-screening evaluation of the potential of NCs to deliver drugs in cells and tissues, and bring insight into the fate of NCs and drugs at the cellular level, which is highly complementary to in vivo studies [ 127 ]. The advantages and disadvantages of the different in vitro and in vivo techniques presented in this manuscript have been summarized in Table 1 , highlighting which information can be obtained from each technique for the assessment of the fate of NCs and NC/drug conjugates, which we believe also hints at the importance of combining in vitro and in vivo studies.…”
Section: In Vivo Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo studies, though more complex than in vitro ones, demand techniques not so accessible such as PET/SPECT, but provide a more “realistic” picture of the fate of the NCs and encapsulated drugs, which has a direct impact on the evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of the NCs and their clinical relevance. In vitro studies on the other hand are more accessible in terms of availability of techniques, which are usually fluorescence based, and provide a useful pre-screening evaluation of the potential of NCs to deliver drugs in cells and tissues, and bring insight into the fate of NCs and drugs at the cellular level, which is highly complementary to in vivo studies [ 127 ]. The advantages and disadvantages of the different in vitro and in vivo techniques presented in this manuscript have been summarized in Table 1 , highlighting which information can be obtained from each technique for the assessment of the fate of NCs and NC/drug conjugates, which we believe also hints at the importance of combining in vitro and in vivo studies.…”
Section: In Vivo Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review will particularly focus on different targets being targeted by NPs, the possible techniques performed to conjugate NPs with targeting agents, and their biological responses in both in vitro and in vivo studies 19 .…”
Section: These Challenges Can Be Overcome As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exactly 5ml of fresh buffer was added to the dissolution vessel after each withdrawal, to maintain a constant volume. Then the withdrawal samples were analyzed by using a U.V 19,20,21…”
Section: Dissolution Studymentioning
confidence: 99%