2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro assessment of cone beam local computed tomography for proximal caries detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Although no difference was found between local CT (LCT) (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany) and conventional radiography in the detection of proximal caries, LCT was found to be more accurate in assessing lesion depth. 39 A number of studies have compared the diagnostic ability of different dental cone beam CT systems and intraoral modalities in the detection of proximal caries. [40][41][42] The accuracy of proximal caries depth measurement using limited cone beam CT (3DX Accuitomo, J Morita MFG, Kyoto, Japan) was compared with PSP digital (Digora, Soredex) and Fspeed film radiography (Eastman Kodak).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Although no difference was found between local CT (LCT) (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany) and conventional radiography in the detection of proximal caries, LCT was found to be more accurate in assessing lesion depth. 39 A number of studies have compared the diagnostic ability of different dental cone beam CT systems and intraoral modalities in the detection of proximal caries. [40][41][42] The accuracy of proximal caries depth measurement using limited cone beam CT (3DX Accuitomo, J Morita MFG, Kyoto, Japan) was compared with PSP digital (Digora, Soredex) and Fspeed film radiography (Eastman Kodak).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Many studies show that CBCT caries detection rates are approximately equivalent to intraoral modalities for non-restored teeth. 11,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] A recent review of the literature summarises that CBCT is equivalent to intraoral techniques at detecting clinically relevant caries lesions in minimally restored teeth; however, beam-hardening and streak artefacts from metal objects and dense tooth structure (enamel) are limiting factors. 24,25 Furthermore, increased dose, cost, time and artefact concerns dictate that bitewing radiographs are still the preferred modality for proximal caries detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Nevertheless, the radiographic diagnosis of caries lesions depends on the contrast and, therefore, demineralization has to encompass at least 30-40% of the enamel layer to be observed, implying an irreversible mineral loss. 8,11 Cone beam CT (CBCT) was developed to address the demand for three-dimensional (3D) information obtained by CT. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The applicability of CBCT images for detecting approximal caries lesions has already been investigated. 4,9,13,18,19,21,22 However, few studies have focused on the diagnostic performance of CBCT for the detection of subtle subsurface enamel demineralization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%