2005
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45911-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro assessment of the APTIMA Combo 2 assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using highly purified elementary bodies

Abstract: The Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 assay has previously been reported to have a high sensitivity. The end point of this assay was evaluated using highly purified chlamydial elementary bodies (EBs). The performance of the APTIMA Combo 2 assay was compared with a commercially available PCR kit, AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis. The number of inclusions of C. trachomatis at the end point of the APTIMA Combo 2 assay was 0.005 inclusion-forming units (i.f.u.) ml−1, which was equivalent to 0.008 EBs per assay. The end point… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serial 10-fold dilutions of C. trachomatis EBs showed that the AC2 test was able to detect positive swab samples which were 10-to 1,000-fold more dilute than those detected by PT or AMP. Ikeda-Dantsuji et al (11) found similar large differences in C. trachomatis endpoint detection rates between AC2 and AMP. Chong et al (5) showed that the AC2 test was able to detect C. trachomatis diluted to 0.01 EBs (10 Ϫ9 dilution) compared to 12 EBs (10 Ϫ5 dilution) detected by an LCx assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Serial 10-fold dilutions of C. trachomatis EBs showed that the AC2 test was able to detect positive swab samples which were 10-to 1,000-fold more dilute than those detected by PT or AMP. Ikeda-Dantsuji et al (11) found similar large differences in C. trachomatis endpoint detection rates between AC2 and AMP. Chong et al (5) showed that the AC2 test was able to detect C. trachomatis diluted to 0.01 EBs (10 Ϫ9 dilution) compared to 12 EBs (10 Ϫ5 dilution) detected by an LCx assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Furthermore, a 0.23% rate of equivocal result generated by combined-gender urine specimens contributes to the overall robustness of the assay. Benefits of paramagnetic target capture for removal of endogenous inhibitory substances, especially those found in urine, have been described (5,11,17,21). Despite this phenomenon, the proportion of female-tomale T. vaginalis screening in this demographic did not change significantly over the 3-year interval (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, past studies used DNA amplification methods that, in a general sense, have been shown clinically (6,26) and in vitro (5,17) to be less sensitive than TMA-based, target capture-supplemented methodology. Interestingly, the study published by Andrea and Chapin (1) focused on co-collections of vaginal swabs plus either endocervical swabs or urine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of our large data set also applies to age delineation of T. vaginalis detection. Past studies (11,27) showed increased T. vaginalis prevalence in older age groups but did not have the benefit of highly sensitive TMA (3,13,23). One account derived from TMA analysis (1) also reported this phenomenon but did not demonstrate C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae detection in patients beyond ages 26 to 30.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of T Vaginalis In Femalesmentioning
confidence: 93%