1988
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90014-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro biocompatibility of air-fired opaque porcelain with human gingival fibroblasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different researches have been performed to study local cytotoxicity of dental ceramics. Cobb et al (1988) investigated the in vitro biocompatibility of porous air-fired opaque porcelain with human gingival fibroblasts. Their results indicated that porous air-fired opaque porcelain is biocompatible.…”
Section: Local Toxicity Related To Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different researches have been performed to study local cytotoxicity of dental ceramics. Cobb et al (1988) investigated the in vitro biocompatibility of porous air-fired opaque porcelain with human gingival fibroblasts. Their results indicated that porous air-fired opaque porcelain is biocompatible.…”
Section: Local Toxicity Related To Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed ceramic restorations restore the morphology and function of lost or destroyed teeth, but cannot completely rebuild the structural relationship with soft periodontal tissues, as new attachment on ceramic materials has never been achieved. Although conventional dental ceramics are considered biocompatible (Cobb et al ., 1988; Rucker et al ., 1990; Kihn & Barnes, 1998; Meijering et al ., 1998), they don't exhibit any bioactive behaviour. Thus, the induction of bioactivity on dental ceramics could lead to new periodontal tissue attachment and consequently to complete sealing of the marginal gap between fixed prosthesis and natural tooth (Abbate, Tjan & Fox, 1989; Felton et al ., 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface modification of body and shoulder ceramic disks by CaO formed the BCa and SCa test groups, respectively, whilst modification by CaO–P 2 O 5 formed the BCaP and SCaP test groups, respectively. Ceramics used for construction of conventional metal–ceramic restorations, were selected as positive controls (B and S), because they are considered biocompatible and thus they are not influenced by electrochemical corrosion neither they released toxic products in the oral enviroment (Newcomb, 1974; Smith & Williams, 1980; Cobb et al ., 1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%