2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro competitive adhesion and production of antagonistic compounds by lactic acid bacteria against fish pathogens

Abstract: et al.. In vitro competitive adhesion and production of antagonistic compounds by lactic acid bacteria against fish pathogens. Veterinary Microbiology, Elsevier, 2007, 122 (3-4) This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the productio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
110
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fish studies, the antagonistic effect of LAB has been carried out on Gram-negative fish pathogens such as V anguillarum and A salmonicida [3,21,[38][39][40]. In the present study strong growth inhibition of Y. rückeri was recorded from extracellular extracts from late exponential growth phase from all of the eleven Carnobacteria strains isolated from the ex vivo experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In fish studies, the antagonistic effect of LAB has been carried out on Gram-negative fish pathogens such as V anguillarum and A salmonicida [3,21,[38][39][40]. In the present study strong growth inhibition of Y. rückeri was recorded from extracellular extracts from late exponential growth phase from all of the eleven Carnobacteria strains isolated from the ex vivo experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The most studied are lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (Lactobacillus, Carnobacterium, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Micrococcus, Streptococcus, and Weissella) (Balcazar et al, 2008;Balcázar et al, 2007;Hagi & Hoshino, 2009;Pérez-Sánchez et al, 2011;Vazquez et al, 2005;Villamil et al, 2002), Bacillus (Ai et al, 2011;Antony et al, 2011;Balcázar & Rojas-Luna, 2007;Bandyopadhyay & Das Mohapatra, 2009;Ochoa-Solano & Olmos-Soto, 2006;Liu et al, 2009;Nakayama et al, 2009;Newaj-Fyzul et al, 2007;Olmos et al, 2011;Salinas et al, 2005;Sun et al, 2010;Vaseeharan & Ramasamy, 2003), Vibrio (Fjellheim et al, 2007;Thompson et al, 2010), Pseudomonas (Abd El-Rhman et al, 2009;Chythanya, 2002;Das et al, 2006;Preetha et al, 2007;Ström-Bestor, Wiklund, 2011), and Aeromonas (Irianto et al, 2003;Lategan et al, 2006;. Yeasts (Saccharomyces, Debaryomyces) (Abdeltawwab et al, 2008;Reyes-Becerril et al, 2008;Tovar-Ramírez et al, 2010), bacterial spore formers (Hong et al, 2005) and recently Actinobacteria have also generated interest due to their high metabolic potential (Das et al, 2010;You et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Use Of Probiotics As An Alternative To Antibiotics In Aqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intake of probiotics has been demonstrated to modify the composition of the microbiota, and therefore assist in returning a disturbed microbiota (by antibiotics or other risk factors) to its normal beneficial composition (Gómez and Balcázar, 2008). As for the mechanisms during this physiological process, the production of antimicrobial substances, competition for nutrients or adhesion receptors, inhibition of virulence gene expression and enhancement of the immune response are all included (Irianto and Austin, 2002;Nikoskelainen, et al, 2003;Vine et al, 2004;Kim and Austin, 2006;Balcázar, et al, 2007). However, the exact mechanism by which these probiotics do this is not known.…”
Section: Probiotics and Gut Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%