2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00029-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro corrosion behavior of bioceramic, metallic, and bioceramic–metallic coated stainless steel dental implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, previous in vivo study showed that the bone osteointegration around single HA coated Vitallium alloy and single HA coated SS were almost similar. Based on the point of clinical success and osteointegration, there was no significant difference was observed [15][16]. Vitallium was originally used in endodontic implants however the biocompatibility was questioned when it was shown to undergo surface corrosion [17].…”
Section: Fig 6 Polarization Curves Of Porous Ta (A) Uncoated (B) Ha mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, previous in vivo study showed that the bone osteointegration around single HA coated Vitallium alloy and single HA coated SS were almost similar. Based on the point of clinical success and osteointegration, there was no significant difference was observed [15][16]. Vitallium was originally used in endodontic implants however the biocompatibility was questioned when it was shown to undergo surface corrosion [17].…”
Section: Fig 6 Polarization Curves Of Porous Ta (A) Uncoated (B) Ha mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implants are usually prepared of metals such as titanium alloys, cobalt alloys and SS 316L (García et al, 2004). The need to diminish costs in public health services has constrained the use of SS as the most economical option for orthopedic implants (Meinert et al, 1998;Fathi et al, 2003), because of its comparative low cost, ease of fabrication, ready availability and reasonable corrosion resistance. However, this material is prone to localized attack in long term use due to the hostile biological effects (Yılmaz et al, 2005).…”
Section: Bioglass As Coating Of Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The beneficial effect of HA coatings on Ti, such as stronger bonding between the bone and the implant, increases uniform bone ingrowth at the bone-implant interface and decreases the release of metal ions from the implant to the body. [16][17][18] To date, a popular manner by which to coat Ti with HA has been through a high heat process called plasma spray deposition, which significantly increases HA crystal growth into the nonbiologically-inspired micron regime. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Here, for the first time, we report a new coating method called molecular plasma deposition (MPD) to produce HA coatings with different crystallinity and particle size on Ti.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%