2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro degradation and controlled release behavior of ,-PLGA50 and PCL-b-,-PLGA50 copolymer microspheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL) is the biodegradable and biocompatible polyester, [1][2][3] which has many medical applications such as drug delivery 1,[4][5][6][7] and the development of tissue-engineering scaffolds. [8][9][10][11][12] However, the cells cannot easily adhere to the scaffolds because PCL does not have any cell recognition sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL) is the biodegradable and biocompatible polyester, [1][2][3] which has many medical applications such as drug delivery 1,[4][5][6][7] and the development of tissue-engineering scaffolds. [8][9][10][11][12] However, the cells cannot easily adhere to the scaffolds because PCL does not have any cell recognition sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, proteins are released out in a controllable manner rather than a simple diffusion when biodegradable polymers are employed to formulate polymeric microspheres encapsulating protein drugs [5,6]. In attempts to control the release rate of bioactive proteins encapsulated within polymeric microspheres, molecular weight and hydrophilicity of the polymer was widely modified to control degradation rates of polymeric microspheres [3,7,8]. However, those approaches were simply dependent on degradation rates of polymers, therefore, could not reflect in vivo physiological changes including temperatures, glucose levels, and pH, where pharmaceutical drug should be released according to micro-environmental changes in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with Dong's report. 33 During the following 8 days, the release rate decreased to about 0.4 mg/day and then it approached complete (80%) of the PHT release from the microcarriers. The release rate in this stage became much slower than that in the first stage, and we hypothesize that release at this point was a consequence of diffusion through pores generated in the dosage form, which was formed by the coalescence of some PHT crystals, since they might stick to each other when the PCL suspensions containing PHT was spray-dried.…”
Section: Pxrd Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%