2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Enzymatic Degradation of Tissue Grafts and Collagen Biomaterials by Matrix Metalloproteinases: Improving the Collagenase Assay

Abstract: Matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -8 are active during the wound healing and remodelling processes, degrading native extracellular matrix and implantable devices. However, traditional in vitro assays utilize primarily matrix metalloproteinase-1 to mimic the in vivo degradation microenvironment. Herein, we assessed the influence of various concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and 8 (50, 100, and 200 U/mL) as a function of pH (5.5 and 7.4) and time (3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h) on the degradation profile of three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
3
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is difficult to extrapolate from collagenase digestion rates to in vivo stability; we note that other studies of crosslinked collagenbased scaffolds have obtained similar mass loss rates. 27 Future studies with long-term in vivo implantation will be needed to better assess the stability of our crosslinked tubes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is difficult to extrapolate from collagenase digestion rates to in vivo stability; we note that other studies of crosslinked collagenbased scaffolds have obtained similar mass loss rates. 27 Future studies with long-term in vivo implantation will be needed to better assess the stability of our crosslinked tubes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro enzymatic degradation of collagen‐based devices by matrix metalloproteinases, usually MMP‐1, allows investigation of the stability of the devices . However, MMP‐1 preferentially cleaves collagen type III, as opposed to MMP‐8, which is the predominant collagenase present in normal wound healing and degrades collagen type I more efficiently than MMP‐1 . MMP‐1, 2, 8, 13, and 14 are capable of hydrolyzing collagen types I, II, and III, while MMP‐3 and 9 are unable to degrade tropocollagen …”
Section: Exogenous Collagen Crosslinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the hydrolytic degradation of PGA/PLGA, collagen mostly degrades in vivo via MMPs‐mediated enzymatic mechanism . We anticipate that collagen scaffolds will actively participate in dynamic interactions between cells and the regenerated tissues; therefore the fate of collagen scaffolds will depend on cross‐linking as well as tissue‐specific mechanical environment that are known to impact MMP‐mediated collagen degradation and remodeling in vivo . Thus, given their strength and compliance values ( Table 1 ), it is possible to develop tissue target‐specific collagen‐based scaffolds, which may demonstrate superior applicability as a scaffold material compared to previously investigated materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%