1992
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(92)90353-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
421
0
11

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 920 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
9
421
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The main contribution towards the interaction is clearly electrostatic, with some hydrophobic contribution [7]. The AFM data also support the macroscopic tensiometric measurements [9]. This demonstration should assist with the design of more efficient gastrointestinal drug delivery systems [30,31].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main contribution towards the interaction is clearly electrostatic, with some hydrophobic contribution [7]. The AFM data also support the macroscopic tensiometric measurements [9]. This demonstration should assist with the design of more efficient gastrointestinal drug delivery systems [30,31].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…As has been previously indicated [7,19,20,29] a significant interaction has been shown between the purified PGM and this form of chitosan on the basis of molecular hydrodynamics, electron microscopy and scanning tunnelling microscopy, consistent with macroscopic tensiometry studies [9]. Figure 4 illustrates the complex formed between the chitosan and mucin structures when mixed together in solution and then immobilized to the APTES-coated substrate.…”
Section: Complexes Of Pgm and Chitosan At 01 M Ionic Strengthsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, the most frequently explored polysaccharide for the design of nanodelivery systems was chitosan, a cationic polymer composed of repeating β-(1,4)-linked N-acetylglucosamine and D-glucosamine units, which is obtained by chitin deacetylation and assumes different molecular weights and deacetylation degrees (Chiellini et al, 2008;Hassani et al, 2012;Mizrahy and Peer, 2012). Apart from the reported biocompatibility and biodegradability (Dornish et al, 1997;Grenha et al, 2010a;Hirano et al, 1988), the most outstanding properties of chitosan rely on its mucoadhesive character (Lehr et al, 1992) and demonstrated ability to potentiate transmucosal absorption both as molecule (Artursson et al, 1994;Borchard et al, 1996;Portero et al, 2002) and in the form of nanoparticle (Al-Qadi et al, 2012;De Campos et al, 2001;Fernández-Urrusuno et al, 1999a;Prego et al, 2005a;Yamamoto et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, chitosan has the significant potential of reducing transepithelial electrical resistance and transiently opening tight conjunction between epithelial cells [9]. In addition, its mucoadhesive property [10] is another advantage for promoting drug adsorption due to combination with anionic substructures such as sialic acid moieties of the mucosa layer. The adhesion of chitosan at the site of drug absorption offers various advantages for an improved uptake of therapeutic peptides [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%