2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro evaluation of osteoconductivity and cellular response of zirconia and alumina based ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The cell adhesion and proliferation rate was significantly higher on the zirconia surface than on the titanium surface, but there was no difference in the synthesis of bone-specific proteins. Pandey et al 42) reported that the stabilizer of zirconia maybe an influencing factor for its biocompatibility. The ceria stabilized zirconia probably reduce the biological activity compared to yttria stabilized zirconia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell adhesion and proliferation rate was significantly higher on the zirconia surface than on the titanium surface, but there was no difference in the synthesis of bone-specific proteins. Pandey et al 42) reported that the stabilizer of zirconia maybe an influencing factor for its biocompatibility. The ceria stabilized zirconia probably reduce the biological activity compared to yttria stabilized zirconia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bulk‐nanostructured zirconia, the tetragonal structure may also reach desirable optical properties if the grain size is small enough to make any birefringence effect negligible (Alaniz et al, ; Zhang, Messing, & Borden, ). To reduce the energy configuration of cubic or tetragonal zirconia and hence reduce the energy required to synthesize the material, zirconia may be doped with other ceramic phases like yttria, ceria, or alumina (Gliga, Skoglund, Wallinder, Fadeel, & Karlsson, ; Pandey, Pati, Mandal, Dhara, & Biswas, ). The dopant phase synthetically creates oxygen vacancies in the zirconia crystal structure, and the resulting lattice‐strain reduces the energy configuration of tetragonal and cubic phases (Kwon et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak at 371 • C corresponds to the onset of Al 2 O 3 crystallization removal of surface (NH 3 and water) and lattice (CO 3 and water) followed by crystallization of Al 2 O 3 at 548 • C [29]. Similarly, the peaks at 681 and 900 • C favour HAp crystallization process, whereas the peaks at 961 and 1146 • C indicate the secondary reactions between HAp and Al 2 O 3 [30,31]. This result clearly illustrates the calcination process at 900 • C (<1000 • C) is effective for the formation of HAp−Al 2 O 3 composite without any interfacial reactions.…”
Section: Dscmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The prepared nanocomposites are analysed for in vitro cytotoxicity activity using MTT assay against MG63 human osteoblast-like cell lines, which exhibits similar adhesiveness and physiology as that of human osteoblasts cells [31] figure 8b. Thus, MTT assay clearly indicates that the prepared nanocomposite is highly compatible for orthopaedic applications.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity Studymentioning
confidence: 99%