2020
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12010048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo Evaluation of Microcontainers for Oral Delivery of Insulin

Abstract: Enhancing the oral bioavailability of peptides has received a lot of attention for decades but remains challenging, partly due to low intestinal membrane permeability. Combining a permeation enhancer (PE) with unidirectionally releasing microcontainers (MCs) has previously been shown to increase insulin permeation across Caco-2 cell monolayers. In the present work, this setup was further employed to compare three common PEs—sodium caprate (C10), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and lauroyl carnitine. The concept … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insulin release in the gastric environment can be prevented by enteric coating, but ensuring optimal unidirectional release in close proximity to the intestinal epithelium has proven challenging to attain in vivo [17]. Moreover, it has proven problematic to conduct in vivo studies of enteric coated capsules in rats, due to long-term gastric retention of such dosage forms [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin release in the gastric environment can be prevented by enteric coating, but ensuring optimal unidirectional release in close proximity to the intestinal epithelium has proven challenging to attain in vivo [17]. Moreover, it has proven problematic to conduct in vivo studies of enteric coated capsules in rats, due to long-term gastric retention of such dosage forms [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caco-2 cells were used for assessment of the cytotoxicity and transintestinal epithelium delivery due to their morphological and functional similarity to the intestinal epithelium [ 44 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the attractive potential of oral insulin is limited by the fact that insulin is a peptide hormone, and as such is destroyed by gastric acids and pancreatic enzymes, and suffers from low permeability through the intestinal membrane. Employing polymer coatings, protease inhibitors and permeability enhancers to protect insulin from gastric acids and improve absorption through the intestinal membrane show promising results [99][100][101][102], although much larger doses of insulin may be required compared with subcutaneous injection and there are concerns about the absorption of potentially toxic excipient molecules [103,104]. An additional limitation with the oral route of insulin delivery is of course the large variability in absorption depending on the presence of food in the intestine.…”
Section: Evolution Of Insulin Delivery Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%