2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13071692
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Generation of Novel Functionalized Biomaterials for Use in Oral and Dental Regenerative Medicine Applications

Abstract: Recent advances in tissue engineering offer innovative clinical alternatives in dentistry and regenerative medicine. Tissue engineering combines human cells with compatible biomaterials to induce tissue regeneration. Shortening the fabrication time of biomaterials used in tissue engineering will contribute to treatment improvement, and biomaterial functionalization can be exploited to enhance scaffold properties. In this work, we have tested an alternative biofabrication method by directly including human oral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, human oral mucosa (HOM) fibroblasts were obtained by enzymatic digestion of the HOM stroma using 2 mg/ml solution of Clostridium histolyticum type I collagenase (Gibco BRL) at 37ºC for 6 hours with agitation. Isolated HOM fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) (Sigma‐Aldrich/Merck) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma‐Aldrich/Merck) and 1% antibiotics and antimycotics (100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 mg/ml amphotericin B) (Sigma‐Aldrich/Merck) using 75 cm 2 culture flasks with filter caps (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany), as previously described by the research group 15 , 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In brief, human oral mucosa (HOM) fibroblasts were obtained by enzymatic digestion of the HOM stroma using 2 mg/ml solution of Clostridium histolyticum type I collagenase (Gibco BRL) at 37ºC for 6 hours with agitation. Isolated HOM fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) (Sigma‐Aldrich/Merck) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma‐Aldrich/Merck) and 1% antibiotics and antimycotics (100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 mg/ml amphotericin B) (Sigma‐Aldrich/Merck) using 75 cm 2 culture flasks with filter caps (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany), as previously described by the research group 15 , 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the vascularization potential of each cell type in a three‐dimensional tissue substitute generated by tissue engineering, we generated novel models of human oral mucosa stroma (HOM) based on the previously described fibrin‐agarose biomaterial. In brief, hydrogels were developed with a mixture of human plasma combined with type VII agarose and cultured cells, as previously described 22 , 15 . To prevent gel fibrinolysis, the mixture was supplemented with tranexamic acid Amchafibrin™ (Fides Ecopharma), and 1% calcium chloride was added at the final step to induce polymerization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of the main fibrillar and nonfibrillar components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the stromal substitute was carried out by histochemistry as previously described [ 25 , 26 ]. Identification of collagen fibers was performed by picrosirius red [ 27 ], whereas reticular fibers were stained with the Gomori’s reticulin histochemical method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, Conejero et al found substantial bone formation when poly-L-lactic acid scaffolds seeded with osteogenically differentiated ADSCs, but not their multipotent progenitors, were implanted into rats [ 23 ]. Blanco Elices et al generated bilaminar fibrin–agarose hydrogels immersed in tranexamic acid-supplemented human plasma containing cultured ADSCs and palate-derived oral mucosa fibroblasts in an attempt to reproduce palatal hard and soft tissues in rabbits [ 24 ]. In vivo cell and tissue differentiation could regenerate the palatal tissues—however, not to control levels—following 4 weeks of observation.…”
Section: Stem Cells In Palatal Bone Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%