2022
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro optical performance of multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in spherical aberration conditions

Abstract: To evaluate and compare the optical performances of 4 different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) in various spherical aberration (SA) conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision to target such values was based on the mean ocular and anterior corneal wavefront profile of normal eyes, as well as previous studies assessing the change in depth of focus with SA modulation. 8,9,[13][14][15][16] Corneal aberration profiles of all eyes were similar at baseline, mirroring the mean population corneal SA of +0.28 mm (Table 1). 13 Baseline ocular SAs, measured with a Hartmann-Shack sensor, are less reliable in multifocal diffractive IOLs (EDOF and continuous range-of-vision IOLs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The decision to target such values was based on the mean ocular and anterior corneal wavefront profile of normal eyes, as well as previous studies assessing the change in depth of focus with SA modulation. 8,9,[13][14][15][16] Corneal aberration profiles of all eyes were similar at baseline, mirroring the mean population corneal SA of +0.28 mm (Table 1). 13 Baseline ocular SAs, measured with a Hartmann-Shack sensor, are less reliable in multifocal diffractive IOLs (EDOF and continuous range-of-vision IOLs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Our results were in accordance with previous optical bench studies showing that the change in depth of focus varied according to IOL models. 16,18 In general, we found that the monofocal IOLs with zero SA were the most sensitive to SA modulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation