2008
DOI: 10.1080/17453670810016957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro testing of chitosan in gentamicin-loaded bone cement No antimicrobial effect and reduced mechanical performance

Abstract: Background and purpose Efforts to prevent infection of arthroplasties, including the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement, are not always successful. We investigated whether the incorporation of chitosan in gentamicinloaded bone cement increases antibiotic release, and prevents bacterial adherence and biofilm formation by clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp. In addition, we performed mechanical and degradation tests.Methods Different amounts of chitosan were added to the powder of the gentamicin-loaded bon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, the implant surface needs to have low cytotoxicity and good biocompatibility with bone cells. Chitosan is structurally similar to glycosaminoglycan and has many desirable properties as a tissue engineering scaffold Cooney, Petermann, Lau, & Minteer, 2009;Kim et al, 2008;Shi et al, 2009;Twu, Chang, & Ping, 2005), but Dunne et al (2008) reported that it had no antimicrobial effect and reduced mechanical performance in gentamicin-loaded bone cement. There have not yet been any reports about the potential use of HACC in this field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, the implant surface needs to have low cytotoxicity and good biocompatibility with bone cells. Chitosan is structurally similar to glycosaminoglycan and has many desirable properties as a tissue engineering scaffold Cooney, Petermann, Lau, & Minteer, 2009;Kim et al, 2008;Shi et al, 2009;Twu, Chang, & Ping, 2005), but Dunne et al (2008) reported that it had no antimicrobial effect and reduced mechanical performance in gentamicin-loaded bone cement. There have not yet been any reports about the potential use of HACC in this field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the effect of ciprofloxacin and vancomycin showed that MW of antibiotics could significantly affect the mechanical properties of cement, at high concentration (10% w/w, P = 0.002). Dunne et al 22 used chitosan, an ultra-high molecular weight macromolecule, reported significant reduction in the compressive and bending strengths of cements containing chitosan, after period of 28 days (p = 0.003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is exacerbated by the addition of antibiotics as a stress riser 29,36 . Elution of antibiotics from cement can www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ also cause adverse effects on cement strength 17,22 . In the present study, density value of the control cement (1.18 g. cm −3 ) also declined over time (1.12 g.cm −3 ) due to interference with the liquid medium, which is in accordance with the other study 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction between the polyelectrolytes and the antibacterial drugs used could be a reason for the weaker antibacterial function of the polyelectrolyte-coated samples loaded with combination drugs. From a different experiment, it was clearly shown that the incorporation of chitosan into gentamicin-loaded bone cement for use in joint replacement surgery had no antimicrobial benefit [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Here, the best result is with the UV-treated and gentamicin-loaded samples.…”
Section: Samples Without Antibacterial Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 65%