2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731112001267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo body composition in autochthonous and conventional pig breeding groups by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging under special consideration of Cerdo Ibérico

Abstract: The improvement of carcass quality is one of the main breeding goals in pig production. To select appropriate breeding animals, it is of major concern to exactly and reliably analyze the body composition in vivo. Therefore, the objective of the study was to examine whether the combination of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers the opportunity to reliably analyze quantitative and qualitative body composition characteristics of different pig breeding groups in vivo.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods such as CT and MRI can also be used for whole-animal evaluation (Font i Furnols and Gispert, 2009;Barchia et al, 2010;Clarys et al, 2010;Kovner et al, 2010), but these methods are slow, expensive, and complex. However, the latter two technologies can be used to create methodologies for evaluating parts of the body to obtain an estimate for the whole animal (Kremer et al, 2012a;Kremer et al, 2012b). The purpose of this paper was to describe the use of DXA in non-ruminant nutrition research, highlighting some differences between DXA and the reference methods and identifying the advantages and disadvantages of this technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods such as CT and MRI can also be used for whole-animal evaluation (Font i Furnols and Gispert, 2009;Barchia et al, 2010;Clarys et al, 2010;Kovner et al, 2010), but these methods are slow, expensive, and complex. However, the latter two technologies can be used to create methodologies for evaluating parts of the body to obtain an estimate for the whole animal (Kremer et al, 2012a;Kremer et al, 2012b). The purpose of this paper was to describe the use of DXA in non-ruminant nutrition research, highlighting some differences between DXA and the reference methods and identifying the advantages and disadvantages of this technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed results and statistical differences of the DXA and MRI measurements especially for the different genotype groups are provided and discussed in a study by Kremer et al (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, by using only one device and software mode, the present study used DXA as quantitative in vivo analysis reference technique to evaluate the potential of MRI as in vivo imaging technique for predicting body composition in live pigs. The pigs originated from different extensive or conventional breeds and their crosses, such as Cerdo Iberico or German Landrace, German Large White, Hampshire, Duroc and Pié train, representing a wide range of body composition as described in a study by Kremer et al (2012). First of all, the coefficients of determination and error estimates between the MRI-derived muscle or fat areas and the DXA-derived tissue masses or proportions were evaluated by linear regression and an additional PLS analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations